I like the idea of doing a small one (which I think is the intention here) learn what works, doesn't work, etc Then maybe spread out and do bigger ones in possibly more popular destinations? jim At 08:10 PM 8/1/2000 -0400, you wrote: >Nat, you're in prime form tonite!:) Do we at least agree that the larger >number of people who attend the conference the better? That being said, >perhaps one goal might be to try to maximize attendance? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Steve Nelson
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Erik Voldengen
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Steve Nelson
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 McCollough, Alan
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 McCollough, Alan
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Nat Papovich
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Nat Papovich
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Don Cuniff
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Nat Papovich
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 John Quarto-vonTivadar
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Jim Priest
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 John Quarto-vonTivadar
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Nat Papovich
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Fred T. Sanders
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Patrick Trongo
- Re: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 paul smith
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Ben Lowndes
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Marc Gadsdon
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Hal Helms
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Paul Johnston
- RE: FUSEBOX DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE 2000 Ben Lowndes
