> or something similar to keep it as clean as possible?

Phil, although I agree that your idea is slightly easier to read, I'm not
quite sure it is as easy to parse


> Also, is there a agreed upon way to specify custom tags used similar to
> included filed (+++)?
>

well I'd parse all files the same way, simply making a distinction between a
required file "+++" versus an optional file "[+++]"

There is little need to parse the distinctions between the files since many
of the ways of calling a file can be interchanged so easily, so you're left
with simply a call method for each file:   CustomTag (ie CF_), Include,
Module, CFX

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Reply via email to