Hi I am going to start moving ahead with the general form of Lee's
specification for now. I agree with how he is handling it and
I think it gives the maximum flexibility for expansion in the future. I
disagree with him that the conversation should be expanded to the cf-talk
list rather than the fusebox list since I see that as a guarantee that
nothing will ever be decided. *IF* the Fuseboxers can come to a consensus
about a suggested format *then* we could present that to the cf-talk list as
a suggestion for how anyone outside of Fusebox could use that same format
for their own use. But, for my own selfish reasons I guess, i want progress
on this topic *now* so I'm loathe to spend much time on the cf-talk list
talking about it--I think the distribution is way to large to get anything
done.
(As it is I think the Spec discussion should have been moved to the fusebox
standards committee for a version 1.0, then to the fusebox list for a
discussion and suggested changed for 1.01)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Foulds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: FuseDoc specification
> Fred, I like your approach. It is consistent with how I code, and I could
> easily adopt it.
>
> Also, standards are not evil. Consider Fusebox. And if you document
> consistently to a standard, the benefits via a spidering parser are
> tremendous.
>
> Thanks John, for adding "++>, <++, and <+> seem to work too", that was
lost
> on me.
>
> As a matter of fact, between your comments, Fred's example, and what I can
> make out about FuseDoc - we're all on slightly different pages about it.
>
> Hal, you mentioned that you posted the current Fusedoc standard a couple
of
> days ago. Do you mean the 15-line refresher and example? I can't find
> anything anywhere else in here.
>
> If there was an easily available specification or style guide of the
> "standard", perhaps we might all be more in tune with each other.
>
> Perhaps on www.fusedoc.com?
>
> >Does anyone have any concrete suggestions for improvements?
>
> Yeah, I'm working on it.
>
>
> John Foulds
> Ottawa, Canada
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.