Well, the good news is there aren't any Fusedoc police that will hunt you
down for using the wrong spec. ;-)
I did a presentation today for the Fusebox conference and talked about why I
came up with Fusedoc as I did. I had five very specific concerns -- and so
far, Fusedoc has satisfied them very well. There are differences of opinion
in the Fusebox community on many issues. Steve Nelson uses app_Globals and
app_Locals while I find that myGlobals suffices for both. Some folks use
application.cfm; others don't. Personally, I think that's healthy.
Anyway, if you want a copy of my presentation, shoot me an email offlist.
Hal
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FuseDoc specification
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Has there been any progress on reaching a consensus for a fusedoc
specification? I've tried out Lee Bokman's FusionDocs tool and I like
it. But I would like to be able to choose something for my first
"real" fusebox project that was at least somewhat standard...
Are the paths started by Hal Helms and continued by so many others in
this thread (which seemed to disappear some time back) going to come
together?
c
- --
Chris Lott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 for message encryption and authentication: USE PGP!
Comment: PGP KeyID: 0x51046CFD
iQA/AwUBOcOjjNaLYehRBGz9EQL5ugCfeQy3EkisyYsGA1CGDTfiVhQ8IlUAoMAo
eYfobSRVkAWMuT+SYBY6rEcB
=3MUe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/fusebox or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
