My experience with Fusebox is that it does very well at integrating the work
of HTML experts, graphics designers, user interface specialists, and coders.
It's one of the things I like most about Fusebox.
Hal Helms
== See www.ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with
ColdFusion & Fusebox" training, Jan 22-25 ==
-----Original Message-----
From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:13 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: Decision
I think that the notion that Fusebox is difficult to work with for
graphics-heavy sites is a bit off. I can't speak from personal experience,
since I'm a lone-cowboy developer, and I use only CF Studio.
BuTtTt, it seems to me that in a multi-developer environment, you should be
able to isolate the visual design fairly easily.
Lets say you've got a 5-person shop, and one person is the architect. This
person hammers out a Fusebox application framework, and lays in the
fusedocs, which document what does what for each given template. That takes
care of your business logic and what-not.
>From there, you could have coders write the CFML, and have designers do up
the foo-foo pretty HTML part. Basically, as long as these folks understand
how to read fusedocs, they should be able to work 100% with GUI tools.
I might be oversimplifying this, but I think ya get the picture. Fusebox
lets you isolate application logic from visual design, and I think this
benefit hasn't really been exploited yet...
Alan McCollough
Web Programmer
Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
Alaska Native Medical Center
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 2:03 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Decision
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I would wholeheartedly recommend that your group adopt Fusebox for your
> Intranet. I have a few concerns about FuseBox on public sites (although I
> haven't come up with a better idea ... so I use FuseBox) but I think that
> FuseBox is ideal for internal stuff.
>
> The downsides to Fusebox that I see are: added complexity to visual
> design
> and search engine friendliness of URLs. It does take a while for some
> graphic designers to "get" FuseBox. Most Intranets have less visual
> design
> than public marketing sites anyway and there are certainly other folks on
> this list who have created visually appealing FuseBox sites. An Intranet
> probably won't need any sort of search engine coverage so that shouldn't
> be
> an important factor.
>
> The benefits of code reuse, greater organization and 'transparency' of
> code
> and improved team development make Fusebox a terrific methodology to use.
> Its not the only way to go, but if you don't have a significantly better
> solution, Fusebox is definitely the best way.
>
> regards,
> Kevin
>
> --------------------------
> Kevin Marshall
> Certified ColdFusion Developer
> eCalton.com, Inc.
> Vero Beach, FL
> www.ecalton.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 561.569.4500
>
>
>
>
> CAlvarado@tma
>
> nage.com To: Fusebox
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
>
> 12/07/00 Subject: Decision
>
> 11:52 AM
>
> Please
>
> respond to
>
> fusebox
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am pretty new to the Fusebox list but have been working with Cold Fusion
> since version 1.5 (ahh the good ole buggy CGI days)
>
> The company I just went to work for has a pretty nice CF setup. CF Server
> on
> Sparc Solaris, and an Oracle backend. I am effectively the lead developer
> and we are completely retooling the Intranet. The question has risen
> whether
> we should instantiate some sort of standardized methodology such as
> Fusebox.
> After the research I have done I am pretty much convinced that we would
> benefit from this methodology. My question is (and this comes from my
> supervisors as well), is what are the downsides (if any) to Fusebox? I
> have
> already given them my thoughts on the upsides based on my reading / common
> sense. Does the fact that the Fusebox methodology seems to inherently
> generate the use of more .cfm files than 'normal' on the server create any
> kind of performance issues?
>
> Thanks for any and all help.
>
> chris.alvarado
> cold.fusion - developer
> [phone] 512.794.6563
> [email] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [web] http://www.tmanage.com
>
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. It
> is
> not for use or disclosure outside TManage without a written proprietary
> agreement. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, or
> agent
> responsible for delivery, you may not copy or deliver this message to
> anyone. Please notify the sender as soon as possible and immediately
> destroy this message and its attachments entirely.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
