Hi webmaster,
I thought the whole point of this list was to debate the merits of FuseBox
and all of its variations. Or am I missing something??
On the other hand, the discussion of CFDJ and its balance is possibly
outside the scope of the FuseBox list.
So I say, please, I am interested in hearing any arguments against FuseBox.
How else does an idea get stronger, if not by exposure to criticism,
thanks all,
Lee (Bjork) Borkman
http://bjork.net ColdFusion Tags by Bjork
-----Original Message-----
From: webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Please kill this string about the arguments against fusebox. If any of you
really want to debate fusebox, then do
it privately. If you don't like it don't use it. end of story, find
another methodology to work with. Fusebox
has worked great for me and I'm sticking to it.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
