Of course,
But criticism is part of the useful info. On CF-Talk I can expect a fair
bit of criticism by people who have no great interest or experience with
FuseBox. This list is where I go for well-founded thoughts (positive and
negative) on FuseBox, based on actual experience.
I am certainly committed to FuseBox, but part of that committment means
identifying weaknesses and helping to improve them.
So at a highly specific level, code code code is fine, but if you want to
make things better, you sometimes have to talk a little more abstract-ly
(good word).
best of luck,
LBB
-----Original Message-----
From: webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I look at this forum as a place to get great useful information and support
from other fuseboxers. ...
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
