If it runs bug free, then who cares about execution times? hehehe
My general rule-o-thumb is sub-200 ms, but most pages can be "converted" to
under 100 ms if you try hard enough. Also, sometimes you're just so psyched
to get a page running at all, that 5000 ms is fine! If speed is an absolute
necessity, then more like 70 ms is better.
It soOoOoOo much depends on your clients' wanker-ness, the number of hits,
the hardware used, the target audience, etc, etc...
NAT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Kaytor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 10:35 AM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: Re: Page execution time too large?
>
>
> Erki,
>
> it depends on what you are doing, how much data you are pulling
> and writing
> to html, etc. I would think that 150 milliseconds is pretty quick for a
> page.
>
> -george
> >From: "Erki Esken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Fusebox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Page execution time too large?
> >Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:26:18 +0200
> >
> > > I wondered if there are any guidelines for a maximum amount of
> > > miliseconds a page should take to process. I have a page which
> > > takes 150milliseconds to execute is this acceptable?
> > >
> > > What do others recommend should be the maximum execution time
> > > of a page??
> >
> >Hmmm.. http://www.allaire.com/index.cfm?mode=debug said 203 milliseconds
> >just a minute ago :)
> >
> >
> >Erki
> >
> >
> >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
