Let me clarify a couple of issues. I'm calling the whole nested fusebox, dot
notation, query sim, etc. thing "Extended Fusebox" to eliminate confusion
with Fusebox 2.0. I don't know that I would look at it as version 3.
As for frames, EF works fine with frames. Go over to www.halhelms.com/bpcf
and grab the "Completed" zip file. This has a whole app done in Extended
Fusebox and incorporates frames. Steve is chiding me for not writing a
whitepaper on this and I'll really try to get to this. In the meantime, I
have created a viewlet for working with EF which I'm sending over to Mr.
Nelzian to put up in his training materials stuff.
Hal Helms
== See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion &
Fusebox" training ==
-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: FuseBox 3.0 dot notation concepts and frames.
After seeing Nats presentation on the dot notation idea for the new FuseBox
standard, I have one issue that I cant quite figure out. How does this work
with frames?
If my root index page loads my frameset, I cant call back to it to load a
circuit app because it will break me out of my frameset. Has this been
addressed yet?
I really want to start using the dot notation method and the xfa's but I
have to have my frames!!
Russ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
