Hmm finally i can see a reason for these url files..
but maybe (moot point) a better prefix would be val_ as in validate?
I still like the idea of xfa's because they keep the navigation in the 
index where it's easy to see.. and i don't have to pop open a bunch of url_ 
files to see where my spaghetti leads.  Maybe we should consider cfmoduling 
url files?  <cfmodule template="url_checkOrder.cfm" xfa.fail="order.sucks">








At 08:06 AM 2/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Nat Papovich wrote:
> > But this can be easily overcome by checking for the existence of xfa's in
> > the fuse before cflocationing, and only providing xfa's to fuses that you
> > want to be able to cflocate out of:
> > <cfcase value="action2">
> >         <cfinclude template="act_page1.cfm">
> >         <cfinclude template="act_page2.cfm">
> >         <cfset xfa1="blah">
> >         <cfset xfa2="blah">
> >         <cfinclude template="act_page3.cfm">
> > </cfcase>
>
>This is going to quickly get ugly.  Sometimes your act files would need
>an xfa depending on the current data. Look at this:
>
><cfcase value="ViewOrder">
>         <cfinclude template="qry_maxorder.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="qry_order.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="url_choosebilling.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="url_chooseshipping.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="act_calculateshipping.cfm">
>         <cfset xfa="blah">
>         <cfinclude template="dsp_vieworder.cfm">
></cfcase>
>
>Explanation of fuses:
>
><cfcase value="ViewOrder">
>         <!--- a couple queries needed for the act/url/dsp files below --->
>         <cfinclude template="qry_maxorder.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="qry_order.cfm">
>
>         <!--- checks to see if the order requires a billing address
>                 checks to see if a user has already specified billing address
>                 If this fails it redirects them to 
> /members/addresses/index.cfm--->
>         <cfinclude template="url_choosebilling.cfm">
>
>         <!--- checks to see if the order requires a shipping address
>                 checks to see if a user has already specified shipping 
> address
>                 If this fails it redirects them to 
> /members/addresses/index.cfm--->
>         <cfinclude template="url_chooseshipping.cfm">
>
>         <!--- simply recalculates their shipping depending on the the address
>they
>                 specified after returning from the url_chooseshipping.cfm
>redirection--->
>         <cfinclude template="act_calculateshipping.cfm">
>
>         <!--- displays the order, the xfa makes sense here--->
>         <cfset xfa="blah">
>         <cfinclude template="dsp_vieworder.cfm">
></cfcase>
>
>Could this be done with XFAs in act files? Sure, but your not going to
>reduce the files because url_choosebilling.cfm/url_chooseshipping.cfm
>get reused all over the place, so I would end up with this:
>
><cfcase value="ViewOrder">
>         <cfinclude template="qry_maxorder.cfm">
>         <cfinclude template="qry_order.cfm">
>         <cfset xfa.billing="...">
>         <cfinclude template="act_choosebilling.cfm">
>         <cfset xfa.shipping="...">
>         <cfinclude template="act_chooseshipping.cfm">
>
>         <!--- uh oh, will this redirect or not??!!!! --->
>         <cfinclude template="act_calculateshipping.cfm">
>
>         <cfset xfa="blah">
>         <cfinclude template="dsp_vieworder.cfm">
></cfcase>
>
>This is even more complicated code that does the same thing! Except you
>get screwed in the act_calculateshipping.cfm because you needed to set
>an xfa for act_choosebilling/act_chooseshipping but but not for
>act_calculateshipping.cfm.
>
>Sure, you could kludge your way around it, hell it probably wouldn't
>even be a problem because you'd name the XFAs different.  But the
>reality is that act_calculateshipping.cfm is a calculation script (i
>know because i wrote it) which means that it's almost always going to
>end up being run in connection with some other script.  There just isn't
>a need for ANY redirection in act_calculateshipping.cfm. So why put one
>in with an cfif statement around it when it's only going to get called
>from a mistake?
>
>I'm just not a big fan of redirection in act files. It makes reuse a
>pain in the neck when it doesn't need to be.  URL files are easy to
>explain to a newbie, XFAs in act files are not.
>
>Steve Nelson
>Online Web Development Training:
>http://www.SecretAgents.com/training
>(804) 825-6093
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to