hehe I know exactly what you mean - I originally got into cold fusion to
build my personal site and make it dynamic - it's advanced a lot since then
but now I'm using fusebox when i go back to rebuild it I'm chekcing to see
noone's reading my code over my shoulder <g>
Rebuilding the site in fusebox though is kinda like tidying up my house.
Makes it feel clean, and the way it should be - makes me feel much more as
though I've coded it the best way I can.
I don't know about anyone else, but I discovered that the way fusebox
shapes my thinking about CF coding, I find myself writing far more advanced
(and yet simple) solutions to things - as a matter of course. Custom tags
and funkier ways of doing things just come bubbling out because they seem
the right way to do it. Has anyone else found that fusebox has improved
their coding? Not just from a methodology and documentation point of view,
but has it changed the way you think about the code and the avenues you head
down to arrive at a solution?
Just curious...
Toby
Toby Tremayne
Code Poet and Zen Master of the Heavy Sleep
Show Ads Interactive
359 Plummer St
Port Melbourne
VIC 3207
P +61 3 9245 1247
F +61 3 9646 9814
ICQ UIN 13107913
-----Original Message-----
From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2001 4:22 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: learning
You da man! I only -wish- I had learned FB simultaneously with CF. Every
time I look at one of my pre-FB apps floating around out there, ugh! Gimme
that back!
Alan McCollough
Web Programmer
Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
Alaska Native Medical Center
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toby Tremayne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:57 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: learning
>
> I was talking to a colleague here about teaching a few other people in our
> company cold fusion. What I had thought was Id teach the coldfusion
> concepts and fusebox concepts at the same time - "this is cold fusion and
> this is the way we write it" sort of thing. Does anyone see any
> difficulty
> with teaching the two at once? Or does it make more sense to tech cold
> fusion then bring them round to fusebox.
>
> My personal opinion was that to teach fusebox later on would be
> silly, as
> I'd have to then RE-educate everyone...
>
> But I'd be interested to hear what everyone thinks
>
> Toby
>
>
> Toby Tremayne
> Code Poet and Zen Master of the Heavy Sleep
> Show Ads Interactive
> 359 Plummer St
> Port Melbourne
> VIC 3207
> P +61 3 9245 1247
> F +61 3 9646 9814
> ICQ UIN 13107913
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
