Remember Duncan from the Frank Herbert series "Dune"? Duncan was cloned over
6000 years and each successive clone was unaware of the previous clone. New
clones where required because the Emperor kept getting angry and killing
Duncan.
---
Jeffrey B. Marsh
Professionals built the Titanic.
Amateurs built the Ark.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:42 AM
To: Fusebox
Subject: OT: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
Hal, how do you know you are the ORIGINAL Hal? I mean... maybe NAT isn't the
first one to clone a Hal...
At 11:13 PM 3/22/01 -0800, Nat Papovich wrote:
>What do XFBs have to do with the attribs scope? I never put them in the
>attribs scope myself, only the local scope (and not as a structure as the
>original XFB outline mentions), and I haven't gotten a ticket yet...
>
>NAT
>
>p.s. The creation (birth?) of Mini Hal is coming along nicely.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hal Helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:54 PM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>>
>> John,
>>
>> Part of the cost is having to prefix everything with "attributes." When
>> dealing with XFAs, etc, this gets to be a significant amount of
>> time. But I
>> agree with you about the search-engine friendly URLs. That's a
>> nice feature.
>> Score one for FormURL2Attributes.
>>
>> Hal Helms
>> Team Allaire
>> [ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
>> classes ]
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:01 AM
>> To: Fusebox
>> Subject: Re: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>>
>>
>>
>> > I agree--that's the only thing that's really nice about having
>> it. Again,
>> I
>> > just wonder if the cost is worth it.
>> >
>>
>>
>> somehow I missed the originating comment that must have started this.
Has
>> someone done a cost analysis to see exactly how much we are really paying
>> for the convenience?
>>
>> (as an aside, if the need for ATTRIBUTES is somewhat moot due to non FB
>> custom tag calls, and therefore only FORM and URL are in play,
>> then perhaps
>> we should need a URL2FORM.cfm or vice-versa tag. I happen to like the
>> ability to have search-engine friendly URLs)
>>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
