Do the two Hals run independently, or is there some sort of load-balanced
clustering going on? I think they must be indies; the one wants to do away
with the status quo and the other, well, i think it does too. Which one
writes for CFDJ?
I think Hal stole the whole XFB from Stan Cox.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Helms [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:09 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
> Guys, let's not start a Fusebox war. Since I seem to be the one most
> guilty,
> by making nasty remarks about FormURL2Attributes, I formally repent in
> dust
> and ashes. (Actually, I have my clone doing it, but I've been assured this
> is acceptable.)
>
> The nested fuseboxes are part of an entire development philosophy that
> begins with wireframes and ends with acceptance tests. You are free to use
> all or any part you choose. To a large degree, we're talking about
> aesthetics. Coming from an object-oriented world, the idea of inheritance
> seems natural and desirable to me. Drag and drop circuits seems desirable.
> Integrated exception handling seems desirable. I'm especially concerned
> with
> the issues that arise from building large-scale applications in a
> distributed team environment, so my methodology reflects my best efforts
> at
> optimizing development for that environment.
>
> Can you do insanely great work without XFB? Hell, yes! Do you need to use
> eXit FuseActions or wireframes or DevNotes or Fusedocs or QuerySims? Hell,
> no! Some people will find them helpful; others will see them as needless
> fiddling with something that works fine already. I find XFB works well for
> me, but I don't want to put down others who don't see the need for it.
>
> I apologize for stirring up the pot.
>
> Hal Helms[2]
>
> Team Allaire
> [ See www.halhelms.com <http://www.halhelms.com> for info on training
> classes ]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:48 PM
> To: Fusebox
> Subject: RE: Musings on Attributes (was Best Practices...)
>
>
> > I have to be honest here... I'm not convinced of the nested Fuseboxes.
>
> Steve,
>
> Same here... the whole XFB nesting thing strikes me as a beautiful mess
> that
> solves a non-problem. Custom tags are a fundamental part of CF, and to me,
> they have always seemed the cleanest, most natural way of calling another
> 'box.
>
>
> --
> Roger
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
