RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions

[G. Scott Wood]

TGIF at 5:45

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Voldengen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Fusebox
Subject: RE: ColdFusion is NOT suitable for Enterprise Solutions


Oh, I can't resist this one.  You know, I think Toys-R-Us may
had more than 100 servers in that farm.  Once, in band camp,
my friend and I "poked" around that site quite a bit.  We'd
randomly hit www1.toys-r-us.com, www2.toys-r-us.com, etc, and
sometimes we got up to about www150.  www69, by the way, often
had debugging information turned on.  I forget what else we
found...

-Erik

>
> My favorite story about Toys-R-Us is that their server farm was in (I
> think, I'd have to look up my notes to be sure) 10 groups of 10
> servers.  Load balancing for all 100 servers was done by a CF
> app running
> running on server 101.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists