We nest about 3 or 4 circuits deep I guess.. Never really counted. I doubt
it is a very big hit at all, but anything that is done on every request
should be evaluated. I assume this metric would be in the startup parsing
and shutdown phase which is usually 0-10ms for all my apps regardless of
presence of application.cfm.
Also regarding Ben's message about the fusebox.org's recommended
application.cfm - we do some weird stuff that coexists with our fusebox apps
sometimes, I'm not sure how that would fit in with our code.. I'll have to
take a look at it next time I'm not doing 1000 things at once.
Thanks for the responses.
-Bill
www.brainbox.tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "BORKMAN Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: RE: application.cfm Q
> Well, I'd rather just have single Application.cfm at the top of the tree
> UNTIL I see that the walk up the tree is causing some discernible
> performance problem. I'd always prefer to juice-up my infrastructure then
> implement any kind of duplication. Duplication is the Devil's Right Hand.
>
> How deep are you nesting your circuits? Do we have any metrics on the
> performance hit from the ap-server searching up five level to reach
> Application.cfm in the root?
>
> LeeBB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> For this reason, you should always have an application.cfm, even if the
> only thing in there is there is a CF comment (to prevent throwing an error
> on blank template).
>
> At 07:31 PM 5/14/01, Bill Davidson wrote:
> >That brings about another question... Since we use app_globals, and don't
> >have application.cfm's - what's the penalty for not having an
> >application.cfm? Does CF look recursively up the tree EVERY time a call
to
> >a fusebox app is made?
> >
> >I guess we could make a simple application.cfm, that doesn't do anything,
> >but at least CF doesn't have to go looking around for something that
ain't
> >there.
> >
>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE:
> This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used
by
> the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally
privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must
not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
> this e-mail or attachment to it.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
