> Compare it to the history of railroads...
Jeff,
I'd rather not. For one thing, it's just a useful development methodology...
it won't become a fundamental building block of transcontinental commerce
and expansion any time soon.
For another, the usefulness of Fusebox is not in any way dependent upon
other people adopting it, and I like that. It simply works, and one of its
more elegant features is that it can co-exist seamlessly with other
methodologies or even with variations on FB itself.
> But please don't complain if your useful practices become
> incompatible with more widely accepted ones.
Why would I complain? You can change all the variable names in your app
tomorrow, and mine will continue to work without modification. If you want
to access my app's functionality, you can do so through WDDX/SOAP/whatever
or a custom tag call. And I'm not worried about losing compatibility with
someone's hypothetical CFStudio add-in, since "core Fusebox" is so easy to
use and manage that such add-ins are completely unnecessary in the first
place.
As I said, I like that.
--
Roger
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
