RE: RIGID STANDARDISATION IN EXTENDED FUSEBOX

[Roger B.]

> A very large part of the
> usefulness of ANY technique is the degree to which its use becomes a
> "standard".

Lee,

I would most definitely disagree. Fusebox was quite useful to me when all I
knew of it was the white paper... at that point, I didn't know or care if
five people or five thousand were using it. Inspired ideas are inspired
ideas.

> It should be especially obvious to everyone on this list that the really
> fantastic thing about FuseBox is the community of users, and the
> vast pools
> of knowledge and experience within, rather than any intrisic value of the
> techniques themselves.

That definitely isn't obvious to me. There are several Very Smart People in
the Fusebox community, but then again, there are even more outside of it...
if all I wanted was a vast pool of knowledge and experience, I'd hang out on
CFTalk and follow Watts and Forta around. [g]


--
Roger


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/fusebox@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists