Hi Paul,
I'm all for Hungarian Notation, but there's no point in using it if nobody
else does. As with all standards, it's only useful when some threshold
number has adopted it. Until that time, it's just an obscure practice
that's going to increase, rather than decrease, the problems involved in
communicating with other developers.
Actually, I'm working on Reverse Hungarian Notation:
<nrqwZ,nqrX,nqrY,+,/,nqwResult>
See? No "CFSET ="
I think it's going to Rock the Rockin Horse House big time,
Leeb.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Mone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2001 4:13
To: Fusebox
Subject: Hungarian Notation
Hello All,
I've finally begun reading the Fusebox book. I'm surprised at how
much I
like it, I really feel like it's making me a better developer already. I
enjoy the standards and methodologies that are laid down, I look forward to
putting them into practice.
Just out of curiosity, why isn't a form of Hungarian notation
implemented
in the standard? It seems like it compliment many of the other practices in
Fusebox.
Paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
