Well, sure, whatever "endorsed by FuseBox" may mean ;-)
If you hadn't realised, I LIKE standards and conventions. In fact, I get in
trouble around this list for liking them TOO much. But I have pretty firm
ideas about what makes a standard worth adopting. There are many factors:
* Intrinsic value (highly subjective, of course);
* Elegance;
* Limitations;
* Learning curve;
* Back-out strategy;
* Popularity;
* Community
etc.
In most cases, provided that the convention is "sufficiently simple" and
"sufficiently powerful", I simply choose the most popular (or most widley
supported, which is not always the same thing).
But many around here don't share my views, particularly about the importance
of popularity and community when it comes time to choose a standard. They
believe in basing decisions upon intrinsic value without much reference to
community. Well, it's a point of view ;-)
See you,
LeeBB
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Mone
....
I didn't realize how controversial HN was, nor did I realize that
I felt so strongly about it ;) Anywho, would you use a different notation
scheme if it was endorsed by Fusebox?
....
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachment to it is intended only to be read or used by
the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mistaken transmission to you. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
recipient. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to
this e-mail or attachment to it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
