>In tha case of XFB, I am happy to answer "Yes". I am currently paying for
>my early-adoption, though, because my team of developers looks at me with
>ill-disguised ennui. THEY don't want to be drawn into obscure practices,
>that's for sure.
>With Hungarian Notation, the answer is pretty clearly "No". I don't see
the
>potential benefits that would lead me to become an earlier adopter.
Now, I'm no Fusebox nut, certianly no XFB nut. Nat thugged me into buying
'the book' a while back, and I've enjoyed it immensely so far. <see
over-inflated comments at the beginning of this thread>
But, it is hard for me to swallow this logic. If you ask me...and I dare to
say, if you ask most developers, you'll find that Hungarian Notation is much
more of a standard, and much farther past "the threshhold" than XFB is....by
a long shot.
---
Paul Mone
Ninthlink Consulting Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ninthlink.com
619.222.7082
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
