I haven't explored the full expansion on CF language for MX yet, however I read about much more CFSCRIPT support. I see the next level for fusebox as a set of UDF's and some very efficient, flexible script.
------------------------------- Adam Bellas "Digital Ninja" Full Sail, Inc. ------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:59 PM To: Fusebox Subject: FB on MX Well, I know that if there's not enough education on what the different ways of including code in MX is, then there's going to be even more fragmentation of the methodology than there is already. I'm going to record (yes, in audio) a piece on the different ways of including CF code for an upcoming FA issue. Might help. > Anyone have opinions on the future of Fb in the MX environment? > > Tim Heald > ACP/CCFD :) > > Application Development > www.schoollink.net > > Fusebox Advisory Committee Member > www.fusebox.org > > Manager Fayetteville ColdFusion User Group > www.fcfug.org > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM > > To: Fusebox > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > Well, I guess I'll post all future messages to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christopher and Gina Fox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:26 AM > > > To: Fusebox > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > Please don't send me any more emails. I'm into the coldfusion / fusebox > > > thing but I want out of the loop. I just opened my inbox and received > > > about > > > twenty-five emails of your exchange. It's a bit of a pain. > > > > > > Thanks > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:19 PM > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > Why useless? The question was as to the origin date. I supplied it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the useless information. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Jeff McNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:02 PM > > > > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that 1988 or 1998??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff McNeill | http://jeffmcneill.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:57 AM > > > > > > To: Fusebox > > > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - Todd Mathews posted a call to action for a common > > > > > > framework. > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - The common framework was hammered out some and the > > > name > > > > > > fusebox was applied. April 9, 1988 - Josh Cyr posted up the first > > > > > > fusebox resource site April 10, 1988 - Michael Dinowitz set up a > > > fusebox > > > > > > forum and mailing list on HoF > > > > > > > > > > > > Hows that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I may be wrong here, but when was FuseBox developed? I > > thought it > > > was > > > > > > > in the year 2000 but someone has told me that they have been > > > working > > > > > > > with it since 1998. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Bailey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
