I see the next level as having all DB and back end processing placed into CFCs (components, like stacked functions inside a wrapper). The front end designs will be in CFINCLUDEs and CFMODULEs. UDFs outside of CFCs will be for special functions and loaded in as libraries. This divides the work into what I consider the proper places. I'm using this as a methodology for the new archives.
> I haven't explored the full expansion on CF language for MX yet, however I > read about much more CFSCRIPT support. I see the next level for fusebox as > a set of UDF's and some very efficient, flexible script. > > ------------------------------- > Adam Bellas > "Digital Ninja" > Full Sail, Inc. > ------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:59 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: FB on MX > > > Well, I know that if there's not enough education on what the different ways > of including code in MX is, then there's going to be even more fragmentation > of the methodology than there is already. I'm going to record (yes, in > audio) a piece on the different ways of including CF code for an upcoming FA > issue. Might help. > > > Anyone have opinions on the future of Fb in the MX environment? > > > > Tim Heald > > ACP/CCFD :) > > > > Application Development > > www.schoollink.net > > > > Fusebox Advisory Committee Member > > www.fusebox.org > > > > Manager Fayetteville ColdFusion User Group > > www.fcfug.org > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: McCollough, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM > > > To: Fusebox > > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > Well, I guess I'll post all future messages to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Christopher and Gina Fox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:26 AM > > > > To: Fusebox > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > Please don't send me any more emails. I'm into the coldfusion / > fusebox > > > > thing but I want out of the loop. I just opened my inbox and received > > > > about > > > > twenty-five emails of your exchange. It's a bit of a pain. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:19 PM > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why useless? The question was as to the origin date. I supplied it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the useless information. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Jeff McNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:02 PM > > > > > > Subject: RE: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that 1988 or 1998??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff McNeill | http://jeffmcneill.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:57 AM > > > > > > > To: Fusebox > > > > > > > Subject: Re: FuseBox Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - Todd Mathews posted a call to action for a > common > > > > > > > framework. > > > > > > > April 8, 1988 - The common framework was hammered out some and > the > > > > name > > > > > > > fusebox was applied. April 9, 1988 - Josh Cyr posted up the > first > > > > > > > fusebox resource site April 10, 1988 - Michael Dinowitz set up a > > > > fusebox > > > > > > > forum and mailing list on HoF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hows that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I may be wrong here, but when was FuseBox developed? I > > > thought it > > > > was > > > > > > > > in the year 2000 but someone has told me that they have been > > > > working > > > > > > > > with it since 1998. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Bailey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
