That actually helped me as well. Thanks for the great info! Thanks, Mike
Sandra Clark wrote: > You are incorrect. The entire idea of the shared directories is to be able > to put the FB and other scripting files out of the web root. > > I usually have mine set up as > scripts > _Controller > _Model > _View > FBCore > wwwroot > images > css > > In wwwroot/index.cfm I have the following setup > <cfset FUSEBOX_APPLICATION_PATH = "../scripts/FBCore/"> > > in fusebox.xml (located in scripts/FBCore/fusebox.xml, I setup up my circuit > files as > <circuit alias="public" path="../_Controller/public/" parent="" /> > > Basically the scripts need to be relative to the Core files, but they don't > need to be in the same exact spot. So core files can be setup to be shared > with several FB applications and the applications themselves can be out of > the webroot, thus enhancing security. > > HTH > Sandy Clark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 12:26 PM > To: Fusebox > Subject: FB 4.1 bug? loader.cfmx, line:206 > > I was setting up a new Fusebox 4.1 site from scratch, having not touched > FB4 in a few months. As part of a migration towards FB4.1 I decided to put > the FB files in a shared directory, to make life easier. After uploading > everything, along with a few test pages in my site, I got the "missing > fusebox.xml" error. I decided to track down the error and discovered what I > thought might be an error in how I thought FB worked. > Here are the lines in question: > > <cffile > action="READ" > file="#fb_.application.fusebox.approotdirectory##fb_.fuseboxXMLfile#" > variable="fb_.FuseboxXMLcode"> > > It was my understanding that when fusebox was loading the fusebox.xml file > that this file should be in the website's root directory, i.e. > fb_.application.fusebox.webrootdirectory, rather than in the shared fusebox > directory? There are other examples of this variable through the loader > file where I would have thought that webrootdirectory should have been used > instead. > > So is my understanding incorrect or is this a bug in Fusebox? If I am > incorrect, why bother being able to put the core Fusebox files outside of > the site directory when you're just going to put the XML files there too, > defeating the purpose of having the core files shared? > > Thanks. > > -- > Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu > Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include <stdjoke.h> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6862 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
