I think it was down to the Slashdotting from the other day. Must not be on any heavy-duty hardware.
--- Billy Cravens -----Original Message----- From: Alan McCollough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:18 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise This be true. The depreciation on hardware is so fast these days you can pick up some gear pretty much by hanging out by a dumpster. Oops, this sounds like an fbcommunity thing now. And Steve started it! Well, now that its underway, the hearings can begin on why fusebox.org was down. We'll need to get the affidavits in the mail and have the Illuminati stand before the grand jury by the end of next week... > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Nelson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise > > It has support for the big databases too. The clustering in enterprise > isn't great because it's > software based. You'll always get a slightly faster failover with a > hardware solution. A little > known fact is that you can get ultra inexpensive hardware load balancers > off of ebay. For a $1000 > you can find a excellent layer 7 balancer which can handle millions of > hits a day, even handle > geographic clusters. > > Steve > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > My understanding is that the only real advantage of Enterprise over > > Professional has to do with clustering and load balancing. I'm sure > there > > are other more "trivial" differences, but I think that's the main one. > > > > I'd guess Professional should suit your needs, given your description of > > the situation. > > > > (Embedded * * * * * > > image moved Charlie Griefer > > to file: Webmaster > > pic00041.gif) SunSource / Sun Health > > Corporation > > http://wow.sunhealth.org > > 623.876.3210 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Alexander > > Ismail To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <aismail1@pacb cc: > > ell.net> Subject: CF Server 5 > Professional vs. Enterprise > > > > 03/22/2002 > > 11:34 AM > > Please respond > > to fusebox > > > > > > > > We plan to move our site from a shared hosting environment to a > dedicated > > box. > > Since we don't run a real high traffic site I am considering putting CF > > Server 5 and MS-SQL Server 2000 on the same box. > > > > Although I compared the specs of CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise > I > > can't figure out whether CF Server 5 Professional is sufficient for my > > needs > > or not. > > > > Any thoughts and/or recommendations on this? > > > > Thank you, > > Alex > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > PearlSoup.com - Building A Better World, One Story At A Time > > > > Alexander Ismail Phone: 415-759-8722 > > 945 Taraval St., #235 Web: www.PearlSoup.com > > San Francisco, CA 94116 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > ------ > > Name: pic00041.gif > > pic00041.gif Type: GIF Image (image/gif) > > Encoding: base64 > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
