Did I mention you can git a used 3-channel SCSI RAID card for 12 bucks? That
might kick up the reliability factor a notch...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Nelson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:41 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise
> 
> nope, it was a harddrive crash.
> 
> Steve
> 
> "Cravens, Billy" wrote:
> 
> > I think it was down to the Slashdotting from the other day.  Must not be
> > on any heavy-duty hardware.
> >
> > ---
> > Billy Cravens
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alan McCollough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:18 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise
> >
> > This be true. The depreciation on hardware is so fast these days you can
> > pick up some gear pretty much by hanging out by a dumpster. Oops, this
> > sounds like an fbcommunity thing now. And Steve started it! Well, now
> > that
> > its underway, the hearings can begin on why fusebox.org was down. We'll
> > need
> > to get the affidavits in the mail and have the Illuminati stand before
> > the
> > grand jury by the end of next week...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Steve Nelson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:13 AM
> > > To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject:      Re: CF Server 5 Professional vs. Enterprise
> > >
> > > It has support for the big databases too. The clustering in enterprise
> > > isn't great because it's
> > > software based. You'll always get a slightly faster failover with a
> > > hardware solution. A little
> > > known fact is that you can get ultra inexpensive hardware load
> > balancers
> > > off of ebay. For a $1000
> > > you can find a excellent layer 7 balancer which can handle millions of
> > > hits a day, even handle
> > > geographic clusters.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > My understanding is that the only real advantage of Enterprise over
> > > > Professional has to do with clustering and load balancing.  I'm sure
> > > there
> > > > are other more "trivial" differences, but I think that's the main
> > one.
> > > >
> > > > I'd guess Professional should suit your needs, given your
> > description of
> > > > the situation.
> > > >
> > > >  (Embedded     * * * * *
> > > >  image moved   Charlie Griefer
> > > >  to file:      Webmaster
> > > >  pic00041.gif) SunSource / Sun Health
> > > >                Corporation
> > > >                http://wow.sunhealth.org
> > > >                623.876.3210
> > > >                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                     Alexander
> > > >                     Ismail               To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >                     <aismail1@pacb       cc:
> > > >                     ell.net>             Subject:     CF Server 5
> > > Professional vs. Enterprise
> > > >
> > > >                     03/22/2002
> > > >                     11:34 AM
> > > >                     Please respond
> > > >                     to fusebox
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We plan to move our site from a shared hosting environment to a
> > > dedicated
> > > > box.
> > > > Since we don't run a real high traffic site I am considering putting
> > CF
> > > > Server 5 and MS-SQL Server 2000 on the same box.
> > > >
> > > > Although I compared the specs of CF Server 5 Professional vs.
> > Enterprise
> > > I
> > > > can't figure out whether CF Server 5 Professional is sufficient for
> > my
> > > > needs
> > > > or not.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts and/or recommendations on this?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > PearlSoup.com - Building A Better World, One Story At A Time
> > > >
> > > > Alexander Ismail                         Phone: 415-759-8722
> > > > 945 Taraval St., #235                 Web: www.PearlSoup.com
> > > > San Francisco, CA 94116            Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > ------
> > > >                    Name: pic00041.gif
> > > >    pic00041.gif    Type: GIF Image (image/gif)
> > > >                Encoding: base64
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to