Re: Fusedoc-ing Exceptions

[Steve Nelson]

Jared- That's an interesting idea. I wonder if it should be part of the in/out IO section? Like <cfthrow>s for the <out>s and <cfcatch>s for the <in>s. I don't know, this is something we should play around with more. Steve Nelson Jared Stark wrote: This is probably something that has been discussed on the fbsteer list, but since I can barely make it through all my emails as it is I don�t subscribe to it. I�m wondering about fusedoc-ing exceptions that may be thrown within a template, specifically I mean user defined exceptions.For example, in my fuses if an attribute is missing I will throw a �com.mycompany.attributes.MissingAttributesException�.I would like to document that somehow so that A) the developer writing the fuse knows about it, and B) a developer using the fuse will know about the exception and can gracefully handle it (hopefully).I imagine something like: <exceptions> <exception type=�com.mycompany.Attributes.MissingAttributeException� onCondition=�A required attribute is missing� comments=�� /> etc� </exceptions> Has something like this been proposed? How does everyone currently document exceptions?*Does* anyone currently document exceptions, or am I (yet again) up in the night? Thanks, Jared ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================