Hal,
With all due respect, it would seem to me that the candidates should
have been asked prior to the election if they would be willing to serve.
Why have an election with candidates that would either not like to serve, or
would not be able to serve due to circumstances beyond their control (ie.
Jobs, life, etc.). Maybe next year, that should be done so that once the
tally occurs the results can be promptly posted.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: hal helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Voting Records
John,
We have to make sure the people who were elected are willing to serve.
That's the delay.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Farrar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Voting Records
** High Priority **
Come on now! What is taking so long? I asked extensive questions about the
results standards in advance. This is what I was told...
Vote Points
01 13
02 12
03 11
04 10
05 09
06 08
07 07
08 06
09 05
10 04
11 03
12 02
13 01
You should be able to write queries that call queries to make this easy if
needed. 1. If vote greater than 0 points equals 14 minus vote 2. Tally votes
by person
There are other steps needed if there is special data structure... but come
on... ask for help if you need it... don't put up a vote and then not run
the vote!
Thanks,
John Farrar
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
