hal helms wrote: > I think CFCs are going to be fantastic when used with > Fusebox, but I don't see a component replacing an architectural > framework.
Agreed. But CFCs will likely reduce a lot of the over-use of Fusebox circuitry that we've seen debated over the last few months. There's no point in coming up with a kludged Person/Employee/Whatever circuit hierarchy and the infrastructure to support it, for example, when an extended "person" component will do the job cleanly and efficiently. Death to nesting! :) -- Roger ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
