Title: Message
|
I
think the toolshed/skyscraper analogy is appropriate here. If you're building
the former, you can get away without blueprints and a good deal of
planning. But if you move much beyond that scope -- and certainly if you tackle
something big -- that lack of planning will have a seriously adverse effect on
the project.
Depends... i have several small apps. (approx. 3
circuits and 10 fa's) in which it isn't needed (IMHO) to use them. But i am
woring on a big app (15 circuits and about 75 fa's) in which i think it is
MANDATORY to use them.
Roeligan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:32
PM
Subject: Who Uses Fusedocs?
I would like to raise an heretical issue.
WHO USES FUSEDOCS? At various user group meetings I have
discussed the use of Fusebox. Everyone seems to be using the coding
methodology by NO ONE is using FUSEDOCS! The coders are structuring
their code with Fusebox but not taking the time to use the design methods
inherent in the development of FUSEDOCS.
This has certainly been true in the last two
large Fusebox projects I have been involved in. The developers do not
want to spend 'coding time' developing Fusedocs and the managers have no
interest in spending development time engaged in that level of planning
detail.
How are various developers planning their sites
if they are not using FUSEDOCS?
__________________________________________________________________
Wallace
Randall
ICQ#: 157983785
| Current ICQ status: |
;)
| +
More ways to contact me
__________________________________________________________________
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
|
online?icq=157983785&img=21
Description: Binary data
