interesting way of looking at it :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "hal helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:23 PM Subject: RE: my issues with wirefram tools I have seen
> I appreciate your comments and think that the idea of a step between > wireframes and prototypes could be really helpful. The trick will be to > follow the Goldilocks Way: not too complex, not too simplistic, but > yielding just the right of information. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Jonathan Kopanas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: my issues with wirefram tools I have seen > > > I emailed them about 2 weeks ago looking for version 2.5 and they said > they would email me when the beta would be available online. I am very > much looking forward to trying it. I have to admit there team or at > least the members I meet are constantly trying to improve there product > and looking for user input. Not many companies do that and the ones > which do are usually very successfull. > > I think my argument is less about the products and more about the > methodology/process of prototyping/wireframing. I was just surprised > when I tried out both wireframing tools to find out they did not allow > more info to be inserted, that is not the products fault but the > methodologies. I just wanted to express my view to maybe open up > people's eyes to another view and get opinions on mine. > > Thanks though for your email. > > > Regarding Adalon's 2.5 beta product (which I would highly recommend > > over the 2.2 version), I think the wireframe tool is really excellent. > > > Wireframes are not really meant to get down to the level of the form > > fields. Rather, they help get buy-in from higher-level decision > > makers, spur thought about what the overall application should do and, > > > incidentally, act as a nifty sales tool! Total time spent on the > > wireframe tool is typically less than 2 hours. > > > > The 2.5 beta that I demo'd at CFNorth is, I think, an enormous step > > forward. Earlier versions were good attempts, but Adalon reaches its > > stride in 2.5. So, where do you get sign off for form fields, etc? At > > this point, it is done in the prototype. Several of us are trying out > > ideas of a step between wireframes and prototypes that may be able to > > hone in on the kind of information you need, John. Things look > > hopeful. > > > > Anyway, hope that helps. > > > > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
