John Beynon wrote: > As for Hal's proposal becoming part of the fusebox spec, it could > happen but I think it's more likely to become a 'best practices' - I > know he's got something new up his sleeve at the moment. Since > everyone has their own stand point on security coming up with a > 'standard fusebox' methodology would be a huge challenge.
Understood. Anyway, assuming that I wish to follow Hal's proposal, is the implementation of the code that should be responsible for traversing the circuit path (reading the FBX_Permissions.cfm files and updating the fusebox.permissions structure along the way) available somewhere or would I have to write my own? > And yes, apart from hard coding your userpermissions, looks like > you're on the right lines, > > There ya go, I answered all your questions, Thank you :) -- Ney Andr� de Mello Zunino Media and Technology Laboratory Campus Computing Centre United Nations University ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
