For a while, we did urge people (strongly!) "not to touch the core
files!!" However, we realized that while this has some definite
advantages, it is simply too restrictive. Different organizations and
developers have different needs. We decided, instead, to create a
standards committee that would decide on what the official standard will
be. This provides greater community involvement and lets anyone modify
the core files SO LONG AS the modified core files are fully compliant
with the specification.

So, it's not that some people can/may/should change the core files, but
that anyone may, so long as those core files remain FB3-compliant. We
hope that this will encourage innovation (not the Microsoft sort!)
around a known, stable standard. Although anyone, in principle, could
charge for their core files, the ones offered by Fusium (www.fusium.com)
and Techspedition are free and will remain free (if Nat and Erik will
forgive me for putting words into their mouths). 

I anticipate that, over time, others will offer their own versions. If
the owners of the core files offer their changes to the Standards
Committee, it will be up to that committee to decide whether to adopt
those changes or not.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan McCollough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Secure.cfm


Now this does make me think of my whole use of the term "Illuminati"
when relating to those who are at the head of the FB movement. And here
is why. I coulda swore that the common mantra around FB3 is "Don't mess
with the core files". 

So then how is it that if certain folk (i.e. members of the Illuminati)
alter the core, it's okay?

This touches a lot of areas, redistribution, pay-vs-free, etc. I can't
be the only guy interested in this...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nando [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:14 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: Secure.cfm
> 
> I'm not 100% on this, but if you study the techspedition core a bit,
> you'll notice Hal's got some code in there relating to security / 
> permissions. These guys have nearly got the marketing through mystery 
> gig aced. ;-) No?
> 
> R Vosmeer wrote:
> > Does this mean there is a new tag coming?
> > 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: 30 May 2002 04:42
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: Re: Secure.cfm
> > 
> > I think it's worth waiting the extra few weeks until Hal's new stuff

> > is released. I found it significantly easier to understand than the 
> > what was proposed last summer.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ney Andr� de Mello Zunino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: Secure.cfm
> > 
> > 
> > John Beynon wrote:
> > 
> >  > As for Hal's proposal becoming part of the fusebox spec, it could

> > > happen but I think it's more likely to become a 'best practices' -

> > I  > know he's got something new up his sleeve at the moment. Since

> > > everyone has their own stand point on security coming up with a  >

> > 'standard fusebox' methodology would be a huge challenge.
> > 
> > Understood.
> > 
> > Anyway, assuming that I wish to follow Hal's proposal, is the 
> > implementation of the code that should be responsible for traversing

> > the circuit path (reading the FBX_Permissions.cfm files and updating

> > the fusebox.permissions structure along the way) available somewhere

> > or would I have to write my own?
> > 
> >  > And yes, apart from hard coding your userpermissions, looks like

> > > you're on the right lines,  >
> >  > There ya go, I answered all your questions,
> > 
> > Thank you :)
> > 
> > --
> > Ney Andr� de Mello Zunino
> > Media and Technology Laboratory
> > Campus Computing Centre
> > United Nations University
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> > 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to