I think one of the strong points of Fusebox is that you can adapt it to
fit your own coding style. I personally use Hungarian notation - there's
no Australian notation as far as I know :) I know that some people even
don't use the underscores (dspDisplayPage.cfm rather than
dsp_displayPage.cfm). As long as you are consistent there shouldn't be a
problem with unix. I think if people were to start attempting to lay
down the law ("In Fusebox, all your filenames must be uppercase and
prefixed with the letters 'SC'") a lot of people would find *that*
unnattractive.K. > -----Original Message----- > From: Balazs Wellisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 14 June 2002 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: naming conventions > > > What are the recommended naming conventions for fusebox code, > if any? I see people write variables in all caps, mixed case, > lower case, etc. Is it xfa.something or XFA.something? > > Personally, I tend to use Hungarian notation for everything. > I find it makes the code look nice and consistent. (And not > just because I'm Hungarian...) > > I prefer xfa.variableName, fusebox.targetCircuit, > query.fieldName, etc. I use the same notation whether it's > CF, html, or SQL code. All lower case with the first letter > of each word after the first one capitalized. > > I think giving the code a nice consistent look over all is a > very good idea. It makes it easier for others to read it and > makes it easier to make heads or tails of it at a later time > even for the original author. Not to mention the case > sensitivity issues on Unix platforms. > > Any thoughts? > > > Balazs > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
