Dear Ray,
REH:
> This becomes a massive systems issue that is confronted by religion (Western
> Religion) as was pointed out in Kurtz's original Hardin post. A point that
> Mike Hollinshead has also been making on a more sophisticated level for over a
> year. MH's new book is wonderful. I hope that some of his ideas published on
> these lists were not stolen by Hardin.
Sally would know if Hardin was a subscriber to this list. I have not(to
best of my recollection) fwd M.H. posts to anyone; in general they seemed
to me both complex & context sensitive. I would have had to write extensive
intros to generate a 'purpose' to a fwd. This isn't a criticism of M.H.
work; historical knowledge and analysis isn't my strong suit, so alot of
his detail goes over my head.
In any case, Ray, the above insinuation is not what I've come to expect
from you. Many people observing the world come to similiar conclusions.
Consensus of subjective opinions is the closest most of us get to
describing reality - except, of course, for those 'seers' who claim direct
pipelines to the truth. :-)
Cheers,
Steve
