From: Ray E. Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have suggested that the traditional Greek solution is not a
>bad one. Begin with developing the perceptions through the
>Arts and make work fit the goals of individual and group
>psycho-physical development. My cynicism about that has
This would be an ideal direction. Shift personal satisfaction from the
consumption of commodities to the arts. [ I agree with the rest of your
points too Ray. ]
I am cynical too. In his new book, THE FUTURE IN PLAIN SIGHT, Linden has
really done a great job of describing the consumer society. He makes the
connection between reason, the irrational, and religion. Moreover, he tells
us why the system can't change:
"The consumer society thrives on its own discontent. This is what makes the
system so supremely resilient and adaptable. Unfortunately, a system that
transforms all attempts to change it into consumer interest loses the
ability to recognize danger and adapt. If every public expression of fear,
anger, or outrage is assimilated as a market opportunity, the system can not
change."
[p. 260]
Linden sees nine different reasons society is likely to collapse early this
coming century. Significantly, none of Linden's reasons are based on
Meadow's, Tainter's, Prigogine's, or Campbell's work.
It's a good book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684811332
Jay -- www.dieoff.org
