Harry wrote, >I suggest that you don't fight it. It really is a great beginning tool for >analyzing human behavior. . . . >You might like to try that - having failed with the Classical Assumptions. Fight WHAT? Failed WHAT? It seems to me that you're exerting yourself more than necessary to prove a point that you claim is "self-evident". If your proposition was indeed self evident, it would need no further comment from you. Regards, Tom Walker ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ knoW Ware Communications Vancouver, B.C., CANADA [EMAIL PROTECTED] (604) 688-8296 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/
- Challenging Assumptions in your discipline Walter Derzko
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipline Harry Pollard
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipl... Jay Hanson
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your dis... Harry Pollard
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your... Jay Hanson
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipl... Arthur Cordell
- FW Re: Challenging Assumptions in your ... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your dis... Harry Pollard
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipline Tom Walker
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipl... Harry Pollard
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipline Tom Walker
- Re: Challenging Assumptions in your discipline Durant