> The problem of health, commodities, the left vs.
> the right, or the mental models that we bring to
> these discussions seems to be making people angry
> everywhere . The future of work is an
> interesting thought except everyone only seems to
> want to discuss the future of their work or their
> favorite philosopher/economist.
>
> Is there any hope for a discussion on what work
> means and what kind of multiplicity there must be
> to create a humane, happy future together? Well
> probably not, but maybe the following will be of
> interest.
>
>
You can work out your futurework aims real well, but if you
don't pay attention to the social/economical conditions that
are able to supply your noble aims, you might as well
don't bother.
> John you assume a hell of alot about their ability
> to understand, don't you think? After all there
> were all of those circles on "Another World" in
> the Soaps of the 1950s-60s and they didn't get it
> then. If it's too hard for the soap operas to
> teach then what hope is there on the net?
>
nothing teaches better than a good helping of experience...
people are able to get understanding in 24 hours as they did
in a lot of historical events.
> I'm having a terrible discussion with a H C who
> lives in England on another list. You would think
> she was a right winger or something. No
> practicality anywhere, just "make work" to prove
> that the lack of a need of workers is not
> real. Anyway, you are one smart fellow and
> much more optimistic than myself in this
> instance. I couldn't even bring myself to reply
> to At on the last post and that must mean I'm
> depressed.
>
I hope you are not describing me here, I have never
argued for "make work" and I am immensely practical...
Eva
> Ray Evans Harrell
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
