Story time as I sit here pen (keyboard) in hand.  My ex-wife got a full
time job last month.  Yep!  A real full-time job, not a contract, not a fly
by night, not an under the table deal, nope, it was a real full time job
with a major (assets of a billion $) company in the high tech world.  This
means benefits, training, security and a move back into society as a
valuable citizen.  (Because her last few jobs have been contracts that pay
no benefits, she was forced to go on Welfare for 10 months after her
savings were gone.)  In fact according to the Ottawa Citizen, she was one
of 300 out of 54,800 unemployed in the Ottawa Hull area to receive such a
gift from the God's.

Of course, it took 11 months of searching, countless resumes, many
disappointments and a salary cut of $12,000 from what she was making a year
ago, but heh, let's not quibble, this is the big uno numo - a real job, a
desk, a boss, a paycheck.  She started as a programmer in 1979, worked for
start-up companies, developed multiple skills, eventually settling on
technical writing.  You know - that person who takes an engineers notes and
converts them into manuals that technicians and customers can read.  A high
tech person, one of that special breed who has been on the cutting edge of
Point of Sale systems in retail, who developed computerized sawmill
technology in BC, who has worked on contract for some of the biggest names
in high tech, the kind that the market keeps telling us that the world
needs.  In fact over the last 17 years her career has been bouncing all
over the place as Companies go broke, merge, downsize, develop team
leadership models, work under old hierarchical systems.  So what's my
problem.  Well it's todays newspaper, that wonderful unbiased, truthful
free press that keeps all of us citizens informed about the way the world
is and it's a TV show I watched last night on NBC - Dateline.

Let's start with Dateline.  AT&T had laid off 20,000 people and Dateline
followed three of them for a year.  One an optical fibre engineer with 17
years experience in R&D, one a woman Budget Director, 27 years experience,
and one a janitor, over 20 years experience.  Now, you have to remember as
I tell this tale, that it is happening in the land of milk and honey, the
good ol US of A who we are constantly told has, according to to-days
Citizen, only 4.6% of its population without a job.  After 11 months of no
income, the engineer was reduced to food stamps and was 5 months behind on
his rent and his wife brought in the only family income of $100 per week on
a partime job.  The Budget Director saw her marriage almost break-up and
after a years searching got a "real job" again.  The janitor was rehired by
AT&T and given retraining as a truck driver, took a cut in wages from 8.50
per hour to commision on mileage which required him to drive 6 days a week
to average about $6.00 per hr and he hates it.

Now perhaps some of the American correspondents can tell me why, in a
country which has a 4.6 unemployment rate, why it is these people with
multiple years of employment history, degrees and on the job skills take a
year to find a job and then why all of them are working for less than they
were before and harder?

Now, of course, in the great White North, were my daily paper insists that
we have had an improvement in unemployment from 9.1% last month to 9.0%
this month and the governments finance minister insists that since 1993 -
1997 they have created over a 1,000,000 full time jobs - yep a whole
million in a country of about 18 million working people over the last 4
years - and that it is doing the best it can, even though our unemployment
rate has not dropped below the official figures of 9% for the whole decade
and that we should all be happy - remember the song, "be happy".  And in
the same paper today, the Ontario government brags that over one half
million less people are drawing Welfare, while poverty groups claim that
the Ontario government, likes its counterpart in Alberta has had quote
"welfare reforms" that have lessened benefits, tighten eligibility
requirements and put in place a number of rules that make it impossible for
some people to qualify.  Meanwhile, in the same paper, a poverty group
asserts that the real rate of unemployment in Canada is 18%!

Meanwhile in the editorial page, I am told that the "myth" that we are the
best country to live in has been refuted by all reputable economists and
that the UN is incompetent and that really, Canada has fallen from #3
(1975) to number #12 (1997) in income per person in the whole world.

How is anyone able to make sense of this immense flow of contradictory
statements from so many authoritative people.  On the one hand, Dateline
takes me into the lives of 3 American families and shows me their distress
and in my own experience, I watch my ex-wife go through 11 months of hell
and humiliation and finally consider herself lucky to take a $1000 per
month pay cut just to have a job that benefits from her 17 years of
experience but doesn't pay for that value.  Meanwhile, I'm told by
reputable journalists, government officials, statistics, political and
economic commentators two things, one everything is terrible, and
everything is wonderful, or conversely, everything is caused by someone
else's stupidity and that if only they would do "x" everything would come
up roses.

Call me stupid, but I tend to believe that the highest quality of
informational is behavioral.  That is those three people on Dateline and my
ex-wife's experience are real to me and all those other opinions, facts,
stats, theory's are just that famous flatulent product known among the poor
as bull-shit and I'm tired of swimming in it.  Well, if you read this far,
thanks a lot, me, I'm going out to shovel some snow, cut some firewood, and
perhaps take my kids to a movie this afternoon, you know, real life stuff
with the environment and family.  Maybe, this evening, I will sit down and
do a little welfare fraud, income tax cheating, networking among my friends
for a little special privilege, you know, those things the elites do on
their day off.

Respectfully,

Thomas Lunde

Reply via email to