Tom Walker shared:
 
Instead, some of the problems of governance today stem from the excess of democracy . . . Needed instead, is a greater degree of moderation in democracy. . ."
 
I was driving my 81 year old mother around the other days and we were listening to the radio news.  Some story of interest came up and she said, "Why doesn't somebody do something about that?"  Which got me thinking about why somebody doesn't do something about that.  On reflection, I realized that every single day, I could find something that somebody i.e. me or you could get involved in and spend a number of years of our lives trying to redress.
 
On reading the above quote, I saw a pattern in which the media presents us with the problem of the day - each and every day - to the degree that the sense of outrage cannot be sustained.  In fact it gets so bad that we cannot even remember the problems of a month ago - remember the Asian Flu.  We as citizens have been made ineffective by the sheer volume of crisis.
 
So, I see two things, one few can get involved individually because the economy demands so much from us in terms of time to earn and two, the problems are presented so continually that it becomes almost impossible to make a commitment to get involved.
 
When elections come, all those problems get subsumed into the spin doctors hands and we are presented with one or two major problems i.e. the deficit or North American Free Trade.  Now, I realize I am rambling here but Tom's point was that the elites create these situations so that the greater citizenry become paralyzed in deciding what is a valid problem to work on.  It is this paralysis that I think is one of the main results of the elites manipulation of people through economy.  If the economic manipulation was reduced by solving a large portion of peoples economic insecurity through a Basic Income, then there is a vast army of "somebodies" who would and could act.

Reply via email to