Dear Tom,
I found this interesting when you first posted it and kept it in the inbox.
How about an update?
Respectfully,
Thomas Lunde

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Arthur Cordell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 14, 1998 1:42 AM
Subject: FW Re: BANKS RESPOND TO CANADIANS' NEED FOR BETTER ECONOMIC AND
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

>Arthur Cordell wrote,
>
>>Not sure that the banks are the best place for information on how the
>>economy works.  Sort of like having GM explain the transportation
>>system--it will sure be biased toward the automobile.
>
>That's exactly what I thought when I heard Ray Protti, pres. of the CBA, on
>the radio and the reason I posted the press release. I phoned in a taped
>response to the CBC afternoon show that aired Protti's announcement
>expressing my hope that the Bankers would "commitment to reflecting the
>diversity of views" about the economy. I'm also going to contact the
Bankers
>Association and talk to them about some of the educational tools I've
>developed.
>
>My message to the CBC afternoon show:
>
>I heard Ray Protti's announcement of "Building a Better Understanding" on
>the afternoon show and I visited the Canadian Bankers' Association website.
>The results of the survey of Canadians' Economic and Financial
Understanding
>are very interesting and I agree with the findings that there is a need for
>a better understanding of the economy and how it functions.
>
>The survey results are especially interesting to me as a policy researcher
>because I have just finished a series of interviews with people who are
very
>knowledgable about economic issues: labour market analysts, human resource
>managers, stock brokers, commerce professors, government officials,
business
>leaders. The picture that I get is that there isn't a single understanding
>of how the economy functions and I certainly hope that the CBA commitment
to
>raising awareness is also a commitment to reflecting the diversity of
views,
>even among the "experts".
>
>My research has found two main clusters of opinion, with people from the
two
>clusters strongly agreeing on some issues and strongly disagreeing on other
>issues. For example, there is a broad consensus on two issues:
>
>Government reports on unemployment conceal a bleaker reality in which many
>job seekers have become discouraged or take part-time work.
>
>People who have prospered owe something back to the community that has
>enabled them to prosper.
>
>But there is sharp disagreement about the following statements:
>
>The best strategy for fighting unemployment is to create a confident
>business climate and eliminate the obstacles to private investment.
>
>Today's corporate culture says if you don't join the rest of the 'team'
that
>stays late or takes the laptop home, you just don't fit in and you might as
>well get out.
>
>On the key issue of hours of work, there is a great deal of polarization
>around the following views:
>
>Proposals to redistribute work time are met with a resistance that tangles
>cultural and economic factors with corporate short-sightedness.
>
>Although voluntary reductions in work time may be worthwhile, it would be
>economically unsound to impose change through legislation or collective
>bargaining.
>
>These are just some examples of the diversity of views. Part of the
>challenge of  communicating is acknowledging and honouring this diversity.
I
>hope the CBA is equal to that challenge.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Tom Walker
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Know Ware Communications
>Vancouver, B.C., CANADA
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(604) 688-8296
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/



Reply via email to