----------
From: Gary Chapman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LA Times column, 5/25/98
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 1998 5:55AM
Friends,
Below is my latest column for The Los Angeles Times, from Monday, May 25,
1998. As always, please feel free to pass this on, but please retain the
copyright notice.
------------------------------------------
If you have received this from me, Gary Chapman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), you are subscribed to the listserv that
sends out copies of my column in The Los Angeles Times and other published
articles.
If you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from this listserv, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank, and put
"Unsubscribe Chapman" in the first line of the message.
If you received this message from a source other than me and would like to
subscribe to the listserv, the instructions for subscribing are at the end
of the message.
------------------------------------------
Monday, May 25, 1998
Digital Nation
Counterculture Is Over -- Is a Backlash Next?
By Gary Chapman
Copyright, 1998, The Los Angeles Times
The "digital counterculture" revolution appears to be over. What's next?
Wired magazine, the fervent oracle of this "counterculture," has been sold
to Conde Nast, one of the "old media" empires Wired once railed against and
a conglomerate built on fashion and celebrity worship. Wired will now join
Vanity Fair and GQ magazines in the Conde Nast stable, certainly the
harbinger of a tamed editorial voice.
The Internet has rapidly gone from being a "revolutionary" technology to a
conventional staple of middle-class homes. Author Bruce Sterling has said,
"Web-surfing is a genuinely popular enterprise -- it's like Monday Night
Football or country line-dancing." Homemakers are trading Beanie Babies on
the Net, and kids are checking their homework assignments online.
Revolutionary zeal about the digital age seems, at best, two or three years
out of date now -- at worst, laughable. The Internet, while still
transforming the economy, is fading into the cultural background, a
communications medium that, for most people, simply supplements TV and the
telephone.
There are still people clamoring to make money off the Internet, of course.
The high-flying stock market, driven by high tech, and the quick fortunes
that are legendary in the industry have made the Internet symbolic of a
"new economy" that is attracting hustlers and visionaries alike.
Remember the famous scene in the movie "The Graduate," in which the young
college graduate, played by Dustin Hoffman, is taken aside by a family
friend at a party and told the one word that will ensure his future? "One
word," says the guest. "Plastics."
That word, a metaphor for everything artificial and oppressive about that
era, was meant to strike terror into the hearts of all baby boomers
confronting a future of dull conformity and plodding careerism.
These days, we could reenact the scene, with the word "Internet"
substituted for "plastics." The digital counterculture revolution is truly
over.
What will be the Next Big Thing? This is the gnawing question that keeps
young entrepreneurs and venture capitalists awake at night, wondering what
the next killer app is going to be and how they can discover it before
anyone else.
But the next big thing may be a popular rejection of the high-tech
lifestyle altogether. A growing number of people are fed up with the stress
of modern life, the financial burdens of competitive consumption, empty
politics, the uniformity of suburbanization, the commercialization of every
aspect of our culture, pointless gadgets and the overwhelming, ubiquitous
feeling that significant problems in our country are neglected because of a
suffocating, indifferent status quo.
The '90s increasingly resemble a speeded-up version of the '50s. The '50s,
of course, produced the '60s, a genuine, full-blown counterculture era. Is
another backlash building now?
There are comparatively few signs of such a backlash, I admit. One early
warning signal: The July issue of Fast Company magazine, the monthly bible
for workaholics caught up in the "total dedication" ideology of Silicon
Valley, is titled "I Gotta Get a Life!" And some new books and movies are
beginning to paint the outlines of an emerging popular disaffection with
consumerism and commodity fetishism, a combination that Harvard University
professor Juliet B. Schor calls "the national religion" of the United
States.
Schor has just published the book "The Overspent American," a sequel to
"The Overworked American." The subtitle of the new book is "Upscaling,
Downshifting and the New Consumer." She describes the frenzied effort on
the part of a majority of Americans to "keep up" with their peers, their
"identity group," typically incurring the costs of maxed-out credit cards,
financial precariousness and stubborn, relentless envy.
But a good portion of her book is about a growing class of "downshifters,"
people who are voluntarily opting out of the "new economy," with its
stress, long hours, neglect of parental responsibilities, competitive
consumption and persistent financial demands. These are people who are
trading higher wages for time, peace of mind and a sense of balance in
their lives.
Another new book, "Turning Away From Technology," published by the Sierra
Club, contains a series of dialogues between thinkers asking hard questions
about where technological trends are taking us.
Two new movies also represent the ambivalence Americans have with our
current, one-dimensional model of progress. Robert Redford's "The Horse
Whisperer" -- with its admitted shortcomings stemming from a mediocre novel
-- attempts to portray the balance of mind one acquires from living in
harmony with nature.
In the liner notes for the movie's soundtrack CD, Redford writes, "As we
race madly toward the end of the century, our lives dictated by e-mail,
cell phones, faxes and other indispensable but mind-numbing contrivances,
let's take a moment to unplug the computer, sit back quietly and imagine a
simpler place."
The other movie is Warren Beatty's "Bulworth," the polar opposite of "The
Horse Whisperer." "Bulworth" is an angry rant about political spin, sound
bytes, Ken-doll politicians groomed for TV, and the merging of our two
political parties into a faceless, gutless mush. While Redford's movie is a
prescription for the affluent -- you need his money to retire to Montana --
Beatty's new movie is a scream on behalf of the urban underclass.
One difference between the '90s and the '50s may be that we're now beyond
the point at which books and movies can jolt us out of a hyperactive
somnambulism. In our media-saturated world, all pleas for resistance may be
merely absorbed into the noise.
But the growing ranks of a "lost generation" -- those people who look at
the contemporary model of progress with sorrow and dismay -- will be an
enduring source of friction for high tech and its accompanying high-stress
life style. The deep human desire for balance, peace of mind, justice,
democracy, privacy and, most of all, authenticity, will compete,
persistently, with the desire for rapidly obsolescent technological
wonders. When we get exhausted with special effects, computer upgrades,
information glut, 70-hour workweeks, jargon and acronyms, bland politicians
and all the rest, we will have lots of company.
Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the University of
Texas at Austin. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------
To subscribe to a listserv that forwards copies of Gary Chapman's published
articles, including his column "Digital Nation" in The Los Angeles Times,
send mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject line blank. In the first line of the message, put:
Subscribe Chapman [First name] [Last name]
Leave out the brackets, just put your name after Chapman.
Send this message.
You'll get a confirmation message back confirming your subscription. This
message will contain some boilerplate text, generated by the listserv
software, about passwords, which you should IGNORE. Passwords will not be
used or required for this listserv.
Mail volume on this listserv is low; expect to get something two or three
times a month. The list will be used only for forwarding published versions
of Gary Chapman's articles, or else pointers to URLs for online versions of
his articles -- nothing else will be sent to the list.
To unsubscribe from the listserv, follow the same instructions above,
except substitute the word "Unsubscribe" for "Subscribe."
Please feel free to pass along copies of the forwarded articles, but please
retain the relevant copyright information. Also feel free to pass along
these instructions for subscribing to the listserv, to anyone who might be
interested in such material.
Questions should be directed to Gary Chapman at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
