------------------------------------------

Monday, December 7, 1998

DIGITAL NATION

Duel Heats Up Over Culture of the Internet

By Gary Chapman

Copyright 1998, The Los Angeles Times, All Rights Reserved

The proposed merger of America Online Inc. and Netscape 
Communications Corp. seems to have pleased Wall Street, and boosted 
almost all Internet stocks, but it created a sour and anxious feeling 
among longtime Internet activists and programmers.

They see this new goliath as yet another encroachment by "the suits," 
the corporate culture that has recently discovered the Internet, and 
as perhaps the cyberspace equivalent of suburban sprawl, the "malling 
of America." AOL's flirtation with the metaphors of commercial TV, 
with its "channels" and ubiquitous advertising, raises the specter of 
the Internet turning into a commercial wasteland like TV, subverting 
the promise of cyberspace as a different kind of medium.

New-media pundit Jon Katz wrote that the AOL-Netscape merger is a 
"catastrophe" for Net culture.

The hacker and activist community on the Internet is deeply 
suspicious of any company that seems to harbor ambitions of being 
emperor of cyberspace, whether it's AOL-Netscape or Microsoft. These 
programmers, activists and idealists think the Internet is working 
just fine already, the way they created it.

What seems to be shaping up is a fascinating duel between two models 
of Net culture, both of them gaining strength in the last year: the 
commercial culture of big corporations and the "gift economy" 
developing among thousands of computer programmers who are 
contributing to "open source" software such as the operating system 
Linux. These two models will coexist for a while, but how they 
interact with each other is likely to be the most interesting story 
in the technology field for some years to come.

Linux has been the rage in all the technology press lately, in part 
because of its radically different development from the corporate 
model represented by Microsoft and its Windows operating system. A 
familiar story by now, Linux was first developed by Linus Torvalds in 
1991, when the Finnish computer science student wanted a version of 
the Unix operating system to run on his 386 PC.

Torvalds used software tools produced by the Free Software 
Foundation, an organization founded by Richard Stallman in Cambridge, 
Mass. Stallman's personal philosophy -- which earned him a MacArthur 
Foundation "genius grant" -- is that software should be free and 
widely shared in a community committed to improving its capabilities, 
not unlike the way we regard scientific knowledge. This does not mean 
that software should cost nothing. It means that software source 
code, the text of a program that is interpreted by computers as 
instructions, should be freely available for modification and 
improvement by others, for the benefit of all.

Torvalds put Linux into this model of software development and relied 
on the distributed intelligence of thousands of volunteers around the 
world to improve the operating system. He also made it free in the 
conventional sense of that word: It's available for download, without 
cost, through many sites on the Internet.

The result is that Linux is now widely used -- estimates of its user 
population vary from 6 million up to 20 million people, depending on 
whom you ask -- and widely admired for its stability, scalability 
(its ability to handle large tasks) and speed. It's highly 
customizable because its source code is accessible to programmers, 
unlike that of Windows. Linux doesn't crash, or only rarely, also 
unlike Windows. And Linux is so fast and efficient that it can 
resurrect otherwise obsolete -- and therefore cheap -- computers and 
turn them into effective Internet servers or desktop machines. And 
because it's free, it greatly reduces the expense of implementing 
cutting-edge computing.

The Mexican government, for example, last month announced that it 
will install Linux in 140,000 computer labs in Mexican elementary and 
secondary schools. Government officials estimated that Windows 
licenses for all these labs would cost them close to $125 million. 
Linux is not only free, it doesn't require replacing older computers, 
and it's possibly the operating system of the future -- Mexico could 
lead the world in producing Linux system administrators. This may be 
the smartest thing the Mexican government has ever done.

Aside from its technical benefits, however, the most interesting 
thing about Linux and other open source software -- which includes 
the scripting language Perl and many applications -- may be the 
corresponding phenomenon of the open source model of development as a 
true social movement. And the resurrection of the idea of a "gift 
economy," a term with a long history in anthropology, to apply to a 
high-tech subculture is intriguing and portentous.

The phrase was coined by French anthropologist Marcel Mauss in his 
1924 book "The Gift" (translated into English in 1935), a study of 
the potlatch ceremonies of Northwest American Indians. It has been, 
since then, a paradigm of anthropological study but almost 
exclusively of "primitive" societies such as South Sea islanders, 
North American Indians and African tribes. It refers to the practice 
among these groups of circulating gifts -- such as blankets, shells 
or herd animals -- as a mode of prestige and exchange.

Anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski, in his 1922 book, "Argonauts of 
the Western Pacific," wrote about the gift circulation of shell 
armbands among the Kula on islands near New Guinea. He wrote that one 
of these armbands enabled a Kula man "to draw a great deal of renown, 
to exhibit the article, to tell how he obtained it, and to plan to 
whom he is going to give it. And all this forms one of the favorite 
subjects of tribal conversation and gossip."

This description is pretty much identical to what happens among the 
thousands of programmer volunteers working on open source software 
code, who clearly view themselves as part of a community. Their 
conversation and gossip can be found on Usenet sites, where people 
get free technical support advice, and on Web sites like Slashdot 
(http://www.slashdot.org), which ills itself as "News for Nerds. 
Stuff That Matters." The volume of traffic on Slashdot is astounding, 
with hundreds of new messages every day. And the overall gestalt of 
Slashdot and other open source sites is evangelical, pushing the 
concept of open source software as the superior method of software 
development.

Eric Raymond, who wrote the influential open source manifesto "The 
Cathedral and the Bazaar," 
(http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/) and who is 
the president of a new organization called the Open Source Initiative 
(http://www.opensource.org/), says, "In a real gift culture, the 
wealth is inside the person's head, not in economic value.

"One of the things that ticks me off," says Raymond, "is when the 
corporate types approach the Internet as a tabula rasa, as unexplored 
wilderness that can be transformed by corporate beneficence. They 
don't understand that the Internet already has its own folklore, its 
own heroes, its own values. If you come to the Internet like some 
British imperialist thinking that your mission is to civilize the 
natives, they're not likely to take it very well." Indeed, antipathy 
to Microsoft and the other "suits" of the "new economy" is part of 
the glue that holds the open source community together.

"This is my politics, as well as my technology," Raymond adds. "When 
someone says 'social movement,' I typically reach for my gun -- it 
usually means coercion. But the open source movement is about 
voluntarism, cooperation, gift-giving, building community. It's about 
working for the benefit of everyone without anyone holding a gun to 
your head."

It will be strange and fascinating if the real long-term threat to 
Microsoft is less another corporate competitor or the Justice 
Department and more a high-tech version of an ancient human ritual of 
exchange, the gift economy. Bill Gates must be watching this in utter 
stupefaction.

Gary Chapman is director of The 21st Century Project at the 
University of Texas at Austin. His e-mail address Is 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   ------------------------------------------

To subscribe to a listserv that forwards copies of Gary Chapman's 
published articles, including his column "Digital Nation" in The Los 
Angeles Times, send mail to:

        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Leave the subject line blank. In the first line of the message, put:

        Subscribe Chapman [First name] [Last name]

Leave out the brackets, just put your name after Chapman.

Send this message.

You'll get a confirmation message back confirming your subscription. 
This message will contain some boilerplate text, generated by the 
listserv software, about passwords, which you should IGNORE. 
Passwords will not be used or required for this listserv.

Mail volume on this listserv is low; expect to get something two or 
three times a month. The list will be used only for forwarding 
published versions of Gary Chapman's articles, or else pointers to 
URLs for online versions of his articles -- nothing else will be sent 
to the list.

To unsubscribe from the listserv, follow the same instructions above, 
except substitute the word "Unsubscribe" for "Subscribe."

Please feel free to pass along copies of the forwarded articles, but 
please retain the relevant copyright information. Also feel free to 
pass along these instructions for subscribing to the listserv, to 
anyone who might be interested in such material.

Questions should be directed to Gary Chapman at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to