JOHN A TAUBE, TECHNOCRATIC SOCIOLOGIST Letter to Editor SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE Fax: 415.5443.7708 August 18, 1999 San Francisco, California Dear Editor: Your paper went along with the media and spilt much “ink” on Iowa’s, August 14th straw vote. Although this event was a meaningless carnival which doesn’t deserve the space given it, its social significance is worthy of discussion. My comments reflect a background in Technocracy Inc., a scientific, educational-research organization. On Sunday, August 15th, one television station interviewed all the republican party’s candidates or a representative of same. The representative for George Bush made the statement that this event was a “feast on democracy.” Immediately her interviewer, taking an opposite view, said it was all about money, not about democracy. The subject was dropped. We have degenerated into a society controlled by money. On Monday, following the straw vote, KQED-FM’s 9:00 am program discussed this event. One republican candidate said that the outcome of the upcoming presidential election would decide all our important matters such as the national policy for schools, police forces, foreign matters, etc. The most important subject was not mentioned: The Pay-Back-to-Money-People who paid for the expensive political campaigns starts after the election. Those who hunt for “bad guys,” or for a grand “conspiracy” that supposedly brought us to a government totally controlled by Money People are displaying utmost ignorance. These people – usually referred to as liberals – are leading masses of people in the wrong direction. They should stop in their tracks and find the root of our problem? We live in the only scientific-technological age ever known and operate this magnificent age with a socioeconomic structure, a “Price System.” This system developed out of scarcity conditions, in primitive societies. The system, built on principles that come from antiquity, from ancient civilizations, worked reasonably well in primitive-neanderthal times. In modern times its use is suicidal. Technocracy proposes a replacement; its Technological Social Design, as it is laid out to fit the needs of our scientific-technological age. Those who take the time to study it will be exhilarated to learn that when – if – we adopt this new type of social structure we will have an age that will be the wonder of the world Sincerely, John A. Taube AN AFTER THOUGHT In that we are a MONEY SOCIETY was illustrated by the S.F. Examiner’s article, August 22, 1999 “Fund Raising Hits Pay Dirt; Politicians Go For Gold,” by Robert Salladay The article starts on a statement made by recently elected Green Party Assembly-woman Audie Bock lambasting California’s freewheeling campaign fund-raising system which she said was designed to ‘squelch electoral justice.’ The article goes on to say that Bock is now going “gang-buster” in doing what she had lambasted. The article quotes her: I’m in this stew with everybody else and the only thing people her understand is MONEY, and it’s very, very unfortunate. When I first came up here, a friend, (former state Sen.) Quentin Kopp, said they won’t pay any attention to you unless you have $300,000 in the bank. He’s right. Unless I have MONEY behind me, I have no credibility with these people here in Sacramento.” (Emphasis added) The whole article is very lengthy but is well worth one’s time to get and read it. The essence of it and the above letter is on the same subject, but while the article gets printed, my letter-to-the-editor hits the trash can. A copy of this letter is going to the Chronicle’s editor and maybe, just maybe, he will explain why my letters are always trashed.
QUESTION: DO WE HAVE A SOCIETY RUN BY MONEY PEOPLE?
Johnny Holiday/John A. Taube Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:26:35 -0700