> Perhaps their only mistake was to trust Swiss banks. > > Ethics indeed!!
Their bigger mistake was (and is) to trust zionist leaders who put their lives at stake, not just a bit of unclaimed money. If the WJC is more ethical, concerned about the needy victims (who are passing away of old age on a daily basis), then why is it still sitting on most of the $1.25 billion that the Swiss banks paid years ago ? The amount is overblown anyway -- Fagan originally claimed $20 billion, the real missing amounts turned out to be at most $10 Million -- i.e. 1/2,000th! The Swiss banks had already looked for the owners they could find and paid out directly around the 1960s. Compare that to US banks where the unclaimed money was simply grabbed by the state soon after WW2. Finally, let's recall that the whole plot was from a _fiction_ novel written by a Canadian zionist who spent years in a Swiss jail for investment fraud. In revenge, he thought he could throw a little mud on CH (writing the book right in jail). Bronfman then read the novel, and thought that was a great idea to get some money, while knocking out the tedious competition to zionist banks. (Who cared it was fiction, in a country where people get their history "education" from Hollywood movies? Btw, isn't it interesting that Spielberg started his career in Bronfman's movie company?) The "needy holocaust survivors" were just the hypocritical pretext. Ethics indeed! Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
