Agree.  A sad development. A nation in need of psychotherapy. 

Other nations are different.  Consider the item below on Japan.  This was
sent offline by Karen to some Japanophiles. I have taken the liberty of
posting article only to FW.  Thanks Karen.

------------------ 

Never Lost, but Found Daily: Japanese Honesty
By Norimitsu Onishi, NYT International, January 08, 2004

 
 
TOKYO, Jan. 7 - Anywhere else perhaps, a shiny cellphone fallen on the
backseat of a taxi, a nondescript umbrella left leaning against a subway
door, a wad of cash dropped on a sidewalk, would be lost forever, the owners
resigned to the vicissitudes of big city life.

 

But here in Tokyo, with 8 million people in the city and 33 million in the
metropolitan area, these items and thousands more would probably find their
way to the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Lost and Found Center. In a four-story
warehouse, hundreds of thousands of lost objects are meticulously catalogued
according to the date and location of discovery, and the information put in
a database.

 

Smaller lost-and-found centers exist all over Japan, based on a
1,300-year-old system that long preceded Japan's unification as a nation and
its urbanization. More recently, it has apparently survived an economic
slump that has contributed to the general rise in crime.

 

Consider that in 2002 people found and brought to the Tokyo center $23
million in cash, 72 percent of which was returned to the owners, once they
had persuaded the police it was theirs. About 19 percent of it went to the
finders after no one claimed the money for half a year.  If the original
owner is not found after half a year, the finder can claim the object or
money. But most finders don't bother making any claims, and the objects and
proceeds usually end up going to the Tokyo government.

 

Hitomi Sasaki, 24, sporting a suntan and a nose-pierce, found $250 in a tray
under a plant outside the restaurant where she works.  "I always hand in
something I find, like purses," said Ms. Sasaki, who had come to claim the
money after waiting half a year. "I imagine that a person might be in
trouble, losing money or a purse."

 

"I used to live in Chicago, so I can tell you how wonderful this is," she
said. "Inside the center, I saw a woman come to pick up an umbrella today.
Only for an umbrella. It's something almost impossible to imagine in other
cities in the world."

 

Children are taught from early on to hand in anything they find to the
police in their neighborhoods. So most of the 200 to 300 people who come to
the center every day take the system for granted, as did Tatsuya Kozu, 27,
who had just retrieved his leather business card case.  "I'm glad," he said.
"I just dropped by here to pick it up, since my office is nearby."

 

On a recent morning, shelves were heaving under bags containing lost items
that spoke of the rhythms of commuting life: keys, glasses, wallets,
cellphones, bags. A small bicycle helmet with "Suzuki" on it and a toy horse
testified perhaps to a child's fickleness.  Skis and golf bags attested
perhaps less to misplacement than to an abandoned hobby; unclaimed wedding
bands perhaps spoke of the end of something larger.

 

Wheelchairs and crutches were harder to explain, though Nobuo Hasuda, 54,
and Hitoshi Shitara, 47, veteran officials of the lost-and-found system, had
well-rehearsed lines.  "I wonder what happened to the owners," Mr. Shitara
said. Mr. Hasuda said with a smile, "If they didn't need them anymore
because they got better, it's a good thing." 

 

One floor was a sea of umbrellas, the most commonly lost item - 330,000 in
2002, or 3,200 for every good rainfall - and, at a rate of 0.3 percent, the
least reclaimed.  The low rate is an indication of how rapidly Japan has
grown rich in the span of a few generations. "In the past," Mr. Shitara
said, "one person barely had one umbrella, or a family had to share one. So
your father scolded you if you lost an umbrella."

 

Everything changes. Mr. Hasuda remembered that at a local lost-and-found
center decades ago, people brought in cabbages, radishes, oranges and other
vegetables and fruit they had found. Because the products would spoil, the
police sold them at a bargain to the finders. Nowadays, fearing
contamination, the authorities immediately dispose of any food.

 

The item with the highest return rate - 75 percent - is the cellphone, which
has flooded the center in the last three years. Owners typically call their
own phones, or the center traces the owners through their subscription and
sends a notification postcard.

 

The lost-and-found property system dates to a code written in the year 718,
according to Hideo Fukunaga, a former police official who wrote a book on
the subject, "Notes on the Law on Lost Property."  Back then, lost goods,
animals and, mysteriously, servants had to be handed over to a government
official within five days of being found. After a year, the government took
over the belongings, though the owner could still reclaim them. The code
stipulated that people had no right to keep lumber found adrift in a flood.

 

In the 18th century, finders were given more rights and were rewarded with a
certain value of the found property. Finders who did not hand in objects
were severely punished. According to Mr. Fukunaga's book, in 1733 two
officials who kept a parcel of clothing were led around town and executed.

 

A new law was created in the late 19th century and then reformed most
recently in 1958. Currently, a finder must hand in an object to the
authorities within seven days, or lose the right to a reward or ownership.
In the case of lost money, if the original owner is found, the finder has
the right to claim 5 to 20 percent of the sum, though usually it is 10
percent.

 

Today, the authorities are thinking of ways to update the system by creating
an Internet listing of the items at all lost-and-found centers nationwide,
or at least those in Tokyo. The system's survival, though, will depend less
on technology than on simple honesty.

 

Last June, Tsutomu Hirahaya, 55, a photographer, found 13,000 yen - about
$120 - on a counter at a betting booth. He handed over the money to an
employee and left his name and address. A few weeks ago, he received a
postcard from the police informing him the cash was his.

 

"I feel uncomfortable holding another person's money," Mr. Hirahaya said "I
think many Japanese people feel the same way and hand over something they
find. I think among Japanese there's still a sense of community since
ancient times."

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/08/international/asia/08LOST.html?ex=10746017

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Futurework] Fwd: Land of the Fear


[maybe they should try a bit of magnesium...]


Fear is driving parents in the United States to strange behaviour

By Olga Lorenzo, The Age
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/05/1073267964070.html


America, these holidays, has been on a high
terror alert. This means that every time you turn
on the news, a banner informs you that the terror
risk is high. It's like a high fire danger or a
high pollen day, but the word used is "terror".

People generally acknowledge that there isn't
much they can do about the "terror threat" and
little prospect that their lives will be touched
by terror. They tune out the dire warnings. But
one wonders how such emotive words impact on
children who, because of their inexperience, are
more apt to conclude that the world is a
terrifying place.

Visiting the United States after having been
educated there and leaving two decades ago, some
of the more visible cultural changes struck me as
bizarre.

Our neighbourhood, Hialeah, was a middle to
lower-class Anglo suburb of Miami; we were some
of its first Cubans. It looks no more or less
affluent, only now it's almost entirely Hispanic.
Like everyone else, we rode our bicycles or
walked alongside the drainage canals to school.
Visiting a fairly seedy part of Montmartre before
arriving in the States, the streets were thronged
at eight, as one would expect, with children on
their way to school. Not so in Miami. On a
morning jog to my former primary school, I met
not a soul. Only when I nearly reached it did I
see children who lived within a block of the
school walked by parents to its gates.

Like other public schools in Florida, the windows
of Twin Lakes Elementary are now boarded with
aluminium cladding that allows no light, and the
school is surrounded by high walls.

Inside, where we had played hopscotch and swung
from the monkey bars, now children are led to sit
on the asphalt. Even those in the upper grades
are led by the hand, and many of these children
are obese. We had the school "fatty"; now the
healthy-looking child is the exception. Many who
aren't overweight are pale and overly thin - the
nerdy, nervous children who whittle away their
hours in front of TVs, computers and electronic
games.

Going by "terror alerts" emitted by the
Government and seized by the media, it would seem
that terrorists have succeeded in frightening a
nation.

Children don't play outside after school as they
once did; while we were there, the sounds on our
block came from my Australian teenagers. "Why
must they be outside?" my mother lamented. "Why
not?" I asked. She admitted there was no real
reason to keep them in.

Yet children are kept in. My brother told me of a
girl who was not even allowed to be alone in her
fenced backyard. The fear of kidnapping and
sexual molestation had overwhelmed her parents'
common sense.

I walked from my school feeling angry, sad and
relieved. Relieved that despite my parents'
objections and sorrow I had raised my children in
Australia. Sad for those robbed of their freedom
and, ultimately, their childhood. And angry
because it seems unnecessary - the crime rate has
not increased significantly, nor have child
abductions. Why then are American children being
raised as if they were Muslim women under the
Taliban - given so little unsupervised freedom,
denied the chance to move about unescorted, to
discover that life is not overwhelmingly
precarious, that it can be navigated and even
trusted?

Another day, I jogged to my former junior high
school. When I was a student, it was the third
most overcrowded middle school in the nation. Our
hours were curtailed to allow for two shifts,
seven to noon and noon to five. Some classes were
in the auditorium, with more than 200 students.
It is no longer a two-session school but, from
the outside, shuttered and enclosed, it could be
a maximum-security prison. Every student has to
show identification to the guard at the entrance.

It is similar in other places I've visited in the
United States. Fewer children walk to school,
where there may be a private contract with the
county sheriff's office for security. A friend
remarked that it was almost always the sad result
of an adverse incident: an intruder in a nearby
school, for instance, or the Columbine shootings.
Parents demand heightened security and schools,
worried about lawsuits, respond.

Long before September 11, 2001, it seems many
children were being raised in an atmosphere of
distrust. Although racial tension, drugs and guns
disproportionately afflict depressed ghetto
areas, even in middle-class neighbourhoods life
has changed, with emphasis on the potential
threats that children face every day.

Another side of the obsession with social
standards seems to be the phenomenon of
proclaiming your child's achievements. People
actually drive around with car stickers that
read: "I am the proud parent of an honour student
at...". There are placards outside homes, small
billboards on the lawn with the student's
photograph and achievements. I am told that this
trend began about 10 years ago, perhaps arising
in the ghettos where any scrap of pride is
elusive. It has spread to middle suburbia. I
think that an Australian child would axe their
parents, thus adding to the crime rate, rather
than allow such an embarrassment.

The mainland has survived two world wars and
other foreign engagements without anything more
than a spent Japanese torpedo drifting onto a
California beach. Militarily, this is the
best-armed nation on Earth. Given the odds of
harm to any one citizen (which are infinitely
less than the likelihood of dying from a car
accident), Americans should be mostly undaunted
by al-Qaeda.

Yet, going by "terror alerts" emitted by the
Government and seized by the media, it would seem
that terrorists have succeeded in frightening a
nation. They may be aided by several decades of
over-reaction to the social malaise that is
endemic to the poorer and disenfranchised parts
of America. It seems that at least one generation
has already grown up in the grip of largely
irrational fears. A loss of equanimity and that
much-vaunted value - freedom - seems to have been
the cost.

Olga Lorenzo is an Australian novelist.

Copyright  � 2004. The Age Company Ltd


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to