M.Blackmore wrote: > > If he had been a bomber targeting the subway, he surely wouldn't have > > taken such a long detour by bus before, > > Just a point of fact: South London is hardly served by tube lines, ... > Personally I'd have gone for a train to London Bridge
The point was that in a city full of surveillance cameras, a bomber who targets the subway would take a __private CAR directly__ to that subway station, instead of taking long bus or train detours there. And, independent from that, the agents who followed him from home would have had to execute him as he boarded the BUS, if the story about "saving lives" and "split-second decisions" is supposed to be true. Looks like they desperately needed a "hit" that day (he came from the house of the real suspect), who was "supposed" to bomb Stockwell station, so they had to execute him there, no matter how many buses he'd taken before... But unfortunately for them, some journos revealed the whole story. As in the Sgrena shooting. Heck, those few non-embedded journos can be a real nuisance, eh... Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
