|
Thanks for posting that, Ed.
As someone who built or bought and sold 6 homes in 15 years of marriage,
I can attest that despite what the realtor and appraisal promises, the
homeowner is hardly ever as confident things will turn out well. Krugman’s
article was an apt metaphor. For your information (fyi):
See Tables of data here http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/8/10/191657/493 Today’s economic headline: Trade deficit climbs as
energy costs soar http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/12/business/12cnd-econ.html Also review the OpChart by Kohut/Hoey on polled issues: Stuck in Second. Bush’s report card from the public for
the first half-year of his second term is not a good one compared with how the
public graded Presidents Reagan and Clinton at a similar point in time. Only
President Nixon, who had by then begun to tumble into the abyss of Watergate,
had a lower presidential approval rating. Unlike Nixon’s precipitous decline
over one mega-problem, Mr. Bush’s fall in public esteem reflects discontent in
a number of areas: Americans are unhappy about economic conditions, the war in
Iraq, Washington’s intervention in the case of Terri Schiavo and general
partisan bickering. In that regard, it is noteworthy that favorable ratings for
Congress are lower than in the past, too. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/09/opinion/09kohut.html NYT Editorial: August 12, 2005 The View From Crawford There may be some truth to that. But the overarching
explanation is that people
are feeling insecure because they understand that today's economy is built on
shaky fundamentals.
Average Americans may not sit around fretting about America's outsized budget
and trade deficits, and its unprecedented foreign indebtedness. But many of
them - as buyers,
borrowers and employees
- are concerned about the increasingly bubbly housing sector. The economy's shortcomings are nowhere more obvious than in
the job market. Nearly four years into an economic expansion, job growth is
still substantially slower than in previous recoveries. Wages for 80 percent of
the work force are barely keeping pace with inflation, and aid for the workers
hurt by global trade is paltry. Because Mr. Bush fails to acknowledge the lackluster job and
wage growth, he fails to respond appropriately. The administration's insistence
that the economy is getting better all the time - a stance that is based on
statistical aggregates that are often divorced from individuals' actual
experience - only intensifies the anxiety that people feel. After the meeting in Crawford, participants said health care
costs had been a major topic of discussion, though they wouldn't say what, if
any, policies the president might pursue. Instead, they crowed about the
administration's postvacation plans: to redouble efforts to privatize Social
Security and to embark on "tax reform," which is premised, in part,
on permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and would therefore mean bigger deficits,
drastic cuts in government services or higher taxes for everyone else. At his vacation home, Mr. Bush told reporters that "the
economy of the United States is strong and the foundation for sustained growth
is in place." The
view from Crawford is clearly rosier than from where most Americans sit. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/12/opinion/12fri3.html |
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
