On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, "Cordell, Arthur: ECOM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Definitions of appeasement on the Web:
>* Giving in to the demands of aggressive powers to avoid war,
etc..
If dialogue is appeasement, we're all doomed. Talk is always good. If
you're talking, you're not shooting.
Well, talk is always good, unless you're the US ingenuously saying
"Gee, let's just go back to square one and start negotiations with
a clean slate" right after their last appeal against the rulings
rejecting their softwood lumber tariff has been rejected, and they're
faced with actually paying up....
-Pete V
Re:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Watters Cole
>
>Comments?
>
>Why we should take Osama's olive branch
>It's the first step in winning the peace
>by John Arquilla, San Fransisco Chronicle, Sunday, January 29, 2006
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
