It is not difficult to make the case that economic issues – and scandal - will damage the Bush administration in upcoming elections more than the Iraq war, which the president acknowledges will be his legacy.  But we should not just judge the war hawk administration for incompetence in the execution of a war of choice, we should hold them accountable for going to war in the first place. This is the issue that will divide the political establishment this year.

 

In the foreword of his War and the American Presidency (2004) Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., the eminent presidential historian, says the obvious: “Pres. Bush has rendered the Bush Doctrine obsolete. [It] requires near-perfect intelligence about the enemy’s intentions and capabilities. Its first application to Iraq shows that our intelligence agencies have a damned long way to go in the quest for accuracy. The credibility gap opened up by the failure to find WMDs in Iraq makes a second application of the Bush Doctrine very unlikely. Remember the boy who cried “wolf”.”

 

We went to war against Iraq because of presidential reaction to phony intelligence. Thirty years ago in a book called The Imperial Presidency, I pointed out that war customarily expands presidential power. Then the return of peace emboldens the Congress to restore the constitutional balance between the executive and the legislative branches. After the end of the Civil War, in which James Bryce noted that Abraham Lincoln “wielded more authority than any single Englishman since Oliver Cromwell”, it took only 3 years for Congress to impeach Lincoln’s successor. After the end of the Cold War, Congress took 7 years to find a second president to impeach.  Impeachment is an extreme way of teaching presidents lessons.”

 

Iraq: What Cheney Truly Has to Answer For
Tom Lasseter, intrepid war correspondent for Knight Ridder, has an appointment in Samarra. In this city, "re-taken" by the U.S., death, devastation and cries of "Why? Why?" come from both Iraqis and Americans.

By Greg Mitchell, Editor, Editor & Publisher, Feb. 16, 2006

We’d like to give Vice President Cheney a break from the wall-the-wall coverage of the face-shooting incident of this past week, so let’s turn to his war in the Middle East, which continues maiming (and creating more terrorists) every day. Over there, the warriors on each side are not using birdshot.

My favorite editorial cartoon of the week comes from my local paper here in the Hudson Valley, The Journal News, which happens to employ recent Pulitzer winner, Matt Davies. He pictured a barren landscape, looking much like Iraq, with buckshot-riddled bodies strewn across the field, Cheney with his shotgun still smoking, and flying harmlessly overhead a duck labled “WMDs.” Cheney looks up at the honking duck, says, “Damn. Missed.”

Well, that pretty much says it all. Yet one of the top American correspondents in Iraq, Tom Lasseter of Knight Ridder, still manages to say quite a bit more, in a gripping, and depressing, article distributed today and posted at the www.krwashington.com site.

E&P has profiled Lasseter and his work numerous times in the past 2 years, and last we heard he was supposed to be back home in the USA, but there he is, still risking life, limb and, no doubt, sanity in Iraq.

Based in Baghdad, Lasseter often gets embedded with U.S. or Iraqi troops out in the hellish beyond. Inevitably he gets ordinary grunts to speak honest truths. His latest piece focuses strictly on Samarra, a city that has lost half of its population of 200,000 since the U.S. supposedly pacified the area more than a year ago. Lasseter reveals the true costs—and the real chance that the death and destruction will go for naught.

Lasseter opens by observing that more than a year after some 5,000 Iraqi and U.S. soldiers re-took the city from the enemy, “American troops still are battling insurgents in Samarra. Bloodshed is destroying the city and driving a wedge between the Iraqis who live there and the U.S. troops who are trying to keep order.

“Violence, police corruption and the blurry lines of guerrilla warfare are clouding any hopes of victory. ‘It's apocalyptic out there. Life has definitely gotten worse for’ Iraqis, said Maj. Curtis Strange, 36, of Mobile, Ala., who works with Iraqi troops in Samarra. ‘You see Samarra and you almost want to build a new city and move all these people there.’

“Soldiers such as Sgt. Powell desperately want to reach out to the community, but they're mired in daily skirmishes. Residents have fled, and a 7-mile-long, 5-foot-high earthen wall that U.S. soldiers built around the city last August has failed to keep out the insurgents.

“Many of the American troops who patrol the city say they don't see much hope for Samarra. Some officers privately worry that the city will fall to insurgents as American troops withdraw." Already, roadside bomb attacks are increasing, with at least 15 going off in January.

And it’s hard to tell who is in the enemy. U.S. military officials suspect that many of the Iraqi soldiers, including a company commander, are on the insurgents' payroll, possibly in league with terror master Zargawi. Yet the 101st Airborne plans to hand over the town to the Iraqi police and army by July 1.

One recent day, which Lasseter describes in vivid detail, a .50-caliber machine gun, on the roof of a schoolhouse, manned by a 21-year-old Texan name Michael Pena blasted an unarmed man on the street into oblivion. Horrified soldiers rushed to the Iraqi, or what was left of him—his organs were now slithering out—and watched him die, as he praised god and muttered, “Why? Why?”

“Haji, I don’t know,” an American soldier replied.

A few days later, Lasseter finds the gunner, Pena, still manning the machine gun on the same roof. Pena doesn’t say a word about the man he killed but he is boiling with frustration.

"No one told me why I'm putting my life on the line in Samarra, and you know why they didn't?" Pena asks. "Because there is no f------ reason."

Perhaps Vice President Cheney, or his new press secretary, Katharine Armstrong, can explain that to him.

 

 

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002034521

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to