> Alas, he may succeed either in (1) hijacking the whole century (and the
> rest of what is left to human life on earth after he gets thru
> with it), or (2) the innocent "people" of the United States crashing
> and burning when our hijacked flight gets shot down by
> the Kyoto protocol signatories, or both....

OR it will crash&burn "Challenger"-style -- because someone was "saving"
money on the wrong spot...  With managers like these, who needs the
"77 virgins" brigade?  (Well, they do get a golden parachute...)


>    Man is not the master of all the stuff which exists,
>    but Everyman is a judge of the world.

A judge but not an executioner?


>    Or, otherwise stated, "G-d ordered me to do it. I was
>    just following orders [albeit of The Supremum]," is not
>    a viable defense after the Nuremberg tribunal (See, e.g.,
>    http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/cgi-bin/vuImag4.pl?i=224 )

If "He" is almighty, why does "He" have to give orders at all?  Why can't
"He" simply do it on "His" own?  (e.g. killing infidels, removing foreskins
etc.)  "Selbst ist der Mann der alles kann!" (proverb)

Chris



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to